[cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..

Jim McBurnett jim at tgasolutions.com
Mon Jul 3 23:18:48 EDT 2006


Well, now I hadn't thought about that..BUT I didn't think that option
existed except on a VG224, or ATA.

This is on an EVM-HD module, so is there something I am missing in the
docs?

Thanks,
Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:42 PM
To: Jim McBurnett
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..

Are these SCCP controlled FXS ports?  If so then I would say the call
blocking feature of CME would be enforced since these ports are
controlled by CME.  I don' have a way to test this at the moment though.

Kevin
On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if I was the only one that thinks the CME4.0 manual is

> wrong on call blocking...
> ON CME 4.0, if you have a block pattern in place it affects the FXS 
> ports and the IP phones.
> The book says it should not..
>
> Anyone else seen this?
>
> My config was simple--
> I blocked 91 as the pattern.
> I could not dial 918005551212 from the FXS ports.. I took it off and 
> it worked..
> This is set for 1 min shy of 24 hours... So it can overridded....
>
> My step is a TAC case, but just wanted a sanity check....
>
> Later,
> J
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list