[cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..

Jim McBurnett jim at tgasolutions.com
Wed Jul 5 13:36:59 EDT 2006


Kevin,
Well, now that makes it clear as day..

I did miss this...
But should the CME docs as least say that SCCP ports are included in the
after hours restrictions and not say FXS ports are excluded?



Thanks,
Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 8:36 AM
To: Jim McBurnett
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..

Hi Jim,

Yes, the EVM-HD module can be SCCP controlled:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/products_feature_guide09186a0
080483a76.html#wp1304136

Kevin
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:

> Well, now I hadn't thought about that..BUT I didn't think that option 
> existed except on a VG224, or ATA.
>
> This is on an EVM-HD module, so is there something I am missing in the

> docs?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:42 PM
> To: Jim McBurnett
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.0 and after hours restrictions..
>
> Are these SCCP controlled FXS ports?  If so then I would say the call 
> blocking feature of CME would be enforced since these ports are 
> controlled by CME.  I don' have a way to test this at the moment 
> though.
>
> Kevin
> On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering if I was the only one that thinks the CME4.0 manual 
>> is
>
>> wrong on call blocking...
>> ON CME 4.0, if you have a block pattern in place it affects the FXS 
>> ports and the IP phones.
>> The book says it should not..
>>
>> Anyone else seen this?
>>
>> My config was simple--
>> I blocked 91 as the pattern.
>> I could not dial 918005551212 from the FXS ports.. I took it off and 
>> it worked..
>> This is set for 1 min shy of 24 hours... So it can overridded....
>>
>> My step is a TAC case, but just wanted a sanity check....
>>
>> Later,
>> J
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list