[cisco-voip] Digit stripping on a Route-Group...

[Ted Nugent]

I fail to see the dilemma? As you’re probably aware
Cisco Best practice recommends always do your digit
manip on the RL and not the RP if at all possible. In
this case you create to RGs (MGCP-RG, H323-RG) add
them to a RL and strip Pre-dot for MGCP and no strip
for H323. I apologize if I’m over simplifying this and
don’t totally understand the question?
Option # 2 would be to add a voice translation rule on
your inbound Dial peers for the H323 gateways and
prepend with a 9 there..
HTH
Ted


--- Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:

> So, I want to use MGCP as my primary gateway
> protocol and H.323 as a
> backup (no SRST, no remote sites).
> 
> The plan is to add the gateways to CCM as H.323 AND
> MGCP and have two
> route-groups, one for MGCP and one for H.323 and
> then combine them
> into a route-list with MGCP first.
> 
> The problem is that I want to strip the 9 for MGCP
> (on the route-group
> or device) and not do so for H.323.
> 
> First off, as a design is this retarded? Second,
> should I strip the 9
> on the gateway or change the H.323 dial-peers to not
> include the 9 and
> strip it on the route list?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com