[cisco-voip] Digit stripping on a Route-Group...

[Ryan Ratliff]

If you are doing H323 and MGCP on the same router on the same trunk 
(s) then the only redundancy you get here is if the MGCP process goes  
belly up.   Of all the problems I've seen this would be the least  
likely to happen IMHO.

Without any devices using this router for SRST I don't see the point  
in configuring h323-fallback.

-Ryan

On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:

So, I want to use MGCP as my primary gateway protocol and H.323 as a
backup (no SRST, no remote sites).

The plan is to add the gateways to CCM as H.323 AND MGCP and have two
route-groups, one for MGCP and one for H.323 and then combine them
into a route-list with MGCP first.

The problem is that I want to strip the 9 for MGCP (on the route-group
or device) and not do so for H.323.

First off, as a design is this retarded? Second, should I strip the 9
on the gateway or change the H.323 dial-peers to not include the 9 and
strip it on the route list?




Jonathan
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip