[cisco-voip] Site that has numbers that are same as 9.@ RoutePattern

[Ted Nugent]

Exactly.. You add EVERYTHING in the NANP... and then
you filter. As opposed to JUST adding what you want to
permit. It opens a hole for toll fraud to the crafty
user. Again to each his own, if you have not had any
issues with it then run with it however it is against
actually against Cisco "Best practices", which from a
VARs perspective give you some sort a leg to stand on
in the event of a problem.
My $0.02

--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ted Nugent 
>   To: Jason Aarons (US) ; ciscovoip 
>   Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:34 AM
>   Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Site that has numbers
> that are same as 9.@ RoutePattern
> 
> 
>   Also, I would never use the .@ in my dialplan...
> it's
>   like creating and ACL and then putting a permit ip
> any
>   any at the end.. but to each his own.
> 
> Why do you say that? We use the @ patterns
> exclusively and have had no problems. With the
> appropriate route filters we are able to filter
> anything we want.
> 
> I found using the @ patterns were extremely easy as
> opposed to having to learn to use the cisco'esque
> reg.exp. technique, especially when we were first
> starting out. I was a little worried that we went
> this way and after asking a few Cisco engineers,
> there seemed to be no problems building a dialplan
> based on it. I had originally been worried about
> memory, but they said it should be OK.
> 
> Anyways, just wondering...
> 
> Lelio


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com