[cisco-voip] Site that has numbers that are same as 9.@ RoutePattern

[Ted Nugent]

Come'n work with me here... It's exactly like the
permit ip any any comparison. :-)


--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> OK - I see, your point, but I'm not sure I agree
> with the permit IP any any comparison. ;)
> 
> And we went through quite a bit testing and found
> that all the filters worked as promised and our
> classes of service each reflect their appropriate
> permissions. 
> 
> Unless of course, a bug appears (like that will ever
> happen). We had a time where although we filtered
> out international calling or something like that,
> when someone dialed 01 and waited, the system
> stripped the 1 and sent the 0 rather than sending an
> reorder tone as expected. Turned out, some guy added
> code some late Friday night for a production release
> to help some people in Europe and it had this
> unexpected affect. Had to wait until the 'overlap'
> system parameter was added to fix things.
> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph *
> Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ted Nugent 
>   To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Jason Aarons (US) ; ciscovoip
> 
>   Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:47 AM
>   Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Site that has numbers
> that are same as 9.@ RoutePattern
> 
> 
>   Exactly.. You add EVERYTHING in the NANP... and
> then
>   you filter. As opposed to JUST adding what you
> want to
>   permit. It opens a hole for toll fraud to the
> crafty
>   user. Again to each his own, if you have not had
> any
>   issues with it then run with it however it is
> against
>   actually against Cisco "Best practices", which
> from a
>   VARs perspective give you some sort a leg to stand
> on
>   in the event of a problem.
>   My $0.02
> 
>   --- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> 
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: Ted Nugent 
>   >   To: Jason Aarons (US) ; ciscovoip 
>   >   Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:34 AM
>   >   Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Site that has
> numbers
>   > that are same as 9.@ RoutePattern
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Also, I would never use the .@ in my
> dialplan...
>   > it's
>   >   like creating and ACL and then putting a
> permit ip
>   > any
>   >   any at the end.. but to each his own.
>   > 
>   > Why do you say that? We use the @ patterns
>   > exclusively and have had no problems. With the
>   > appropriate route filters we are able to filter
>   > anything we want.
>   > 
>   > I found using the @ patterns were extremely easy
> as
>   > opposed to having to learn to use the
> cisco'esque
>   > reg.exp. technique, especially when we were
> first
>   > starting out. I was a little worried that we
> went
>   > this way and after asking a few Cisco engineers,
>   > there seemed to be no problems building a
> dialplan
>   > based on it. I had originally been worried about
>   > memory, but they said it should be OK.
>   > 
>   > Anyways, just wondering...
>   > 
>   > Lelio
> 
> 
>   __________________________________________________
>   Do You Yahoo!?
>   Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
>   http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com