[cisco-voip] CCM 5 on VMWare Server 1.0.0

Fri Jul 28 10:28:22 EDT 2006

With Unity, you could change the MAC under the Network Adapter settings
in windows (advanced tab).

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Philip Walenta
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:00 AM
To: 'Ted Nugent'; 'Israel Lang'
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 5 on VMWare Server 1.0.0

>From experience, the OS seems to use the LAA (Locally Administered
Address)
by default.  If memory serves there is a way to get it to use the BIA.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ted Nugent
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 8:54 AM
> To: Israel Lang
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 5 on VMWare Server 1.0.0
> 
> Thanks for explaining what a MAC address is Isreal...
> However I think that the real question is whether
> Unity/CM5(Linux??) uses the "logical" registry value or if it 
> looks at the BIA (Burned-In Address), typically if this can 
> be changed it can only be changed at the BIOS level or using 
> a diagnostic utility. I vaguely remember from some Unity 
> class, way back when, that Unity locks in on the BIA and not 
> logical address in the registry. Has anyone tried just 
> changing the registry value or the linux equivalent?
> Thanks
> 
> 
> --- Israel Lang <zephy316 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address
> > 
> > 
> > Under Windows XP
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP>, the MAC address can be 
> > changed in the Ethernet adapter's Properties menu, in the Advanced 
> > tab, as "MAC Address", "Locally Administered Address", "Ethernet 
> > Address", "Physical Address" or "Network Address". The exact name 
> > depends on the Ethernet driver used; not all drivers 
> support changing 
> > the MAC address in this way.
> > 
> > However, a better solution - requiring Administrative User 
> Rights - is 
> > to pass over the System Registry Keys under
> >
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D3
> 6E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}.
> > Here settings for each network interface can be found. The 
> contents of 
> > the string value called 'NetworkAddress' will be used to 
> set the MAC 
> > address of the adapter when next it is enabled. Resetting 
> the adapter 
> > can be accomplished in script with the freely available 
> command line 
> > utility
> >
> devcon<http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US
> ;Q311272>from
> > Microsoft, or from the adapters context menu in the Network 
> > Connections control panel applet.
> > 
> > There is a FREEWARE tool called Technitium MAC Address Changer v3.1
> >
> (FREEWARE)<http://www.technitium.com/software/mac_changer_v3.1
> /mac_changer_v3.1.html>which
> > allows you to change MAC address of your network interface 
> card (NIC) 
> > in seconds, irrespective of its driver or manufacturer.
> > 
> > Note: to check your MAC address easily under Windows NT4, 
> Windows 2000 
> > or Windows XP: Click "Start", choose "Run...", type CMD and 
> click OK, 
> > then type ipconfig /all in the Command Prompt window that 
> appears. The 
> > number under physical address is the MAC address. If 
> multiple IP are 
> > displayed, you should look under the label "Ethernet 
> adapter x", where 
> > x is the name of your connection (which is Local Area Connection by 
> > default).
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/27/06, Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Ryan...
> > > No.. perfect sidetrack and good point...! and
> > actually
> > > the customer came up with that idea before I did
> > :-(.
> > > But it was an older DL380-G2 and the HP dude
> > informed
> > > us that this could not be done on that vintage server?? I 
> remember 
> > > doing this on IBM NICs and
> > laptops
> > > years ago so I could not beleive it wasn't an
> > option.
> > > I've honestly not had to do that before on an HP
> > MCS
> > > server myself but you can do it via the HP
> > foundation
> > > CDs??
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not to sidetrack the thread but in that case I'd
> > be
> > > > changing the mac
> > > > on the Unity server.
> > > >
> > > > -Ryan
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 27, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Ted Nugent wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Right on with the hardware failure deal
> > scenario...
> > > > emailing licensing and waiting for someone in
> > RTP or
> > > > SJ to come on shift is unacceptable. During
> > working
> > > > hours in the states turn around is pretty quick
> > but
> > > > I've found that APT and EMEA are good at "AVVID"
> > TAC
> > > > but licensing is non-existent! I had the exact scenario you 
> > > > mentioned with Unity at 1am Eastern
> > US
> > > > time and had to wait until 8:30am the next day
> > to
> > > > get
> > > > a .lic file! The customer was furious because
> > they
> > > > fronted most of their calls through a unity AA.
> > The
> > > > HP
> > > > guy was there to replace the motherboard within
> > 3
> > > > hours as contracted but we had to wait an
> > additional
> > > > 4
> > > > hours for a new .lic file. And yes I did try
> > calling
> > > > in a P1 but no one could and/or knew how to
> > help.
> > > > That's Unity. now if you have the same problem
> > with
> > > > your CM Cluster its Goodbye Cisco and Hello
> > Avaya
> > > > for
> > > > your customer.
> > > >
> > > > --- Ryan LaTorre <rlatorre at unislumin.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Not to tow the cisco line too much, I would
> > argue
> > > > > that the 3.4GB of
> > > > > patches in three months is a good thing. 
> > Cisco is
> > > > > undoubtedly dealing
> > > > > with a large number of bugs, which should be expected 
> of a new 
> > > > > product.
> > > > > Cisco has done their part to keep it on New
> > > > Product
> > > > > Hold, primarily
> > > > > approving lab deployments in which the real
> > issues
> > > > > will be discovered.
> > > > > The patches have come fast and furious which
> > tells
> > > > > me they're feverishly
> > > > > ramping up the stability.
> > > > >
> > > > > Having said that, I agree with the demo
> > licensing
> > > > > sentiments 100%.
> > > > > There needs to be something readily available
> > for
> > > > > partners and Cisco SEs
> > > > > to work with.
> > > > >
> > > > > Demo licensing isn't my only concern though.
> > > > > Consider the operational
> > > > > impact. The publisher hardware dies (somehow).
> > An
> > > > > extra server is
> > > > > brought into service to quickly replace it,
> > but
> > > > wait
> > > > > - to activate and
> > > > > use it a special licensing request has to be 
> fulfilled. I don't 
> > > > > know how long that takes, especially if it's 2am.  Or 
> replacing 
> > > > > a subscriber with new hardware - it may be 
> advantageous to build
> > a
> > > > new
> > > > > server with a new
> > > > > entity, add it into the cluster, and
> > subsequently
> > > > > remove the existing
> > > > > one a few days later.  This will no longer be possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > I understand the need for licensing, but the 
> operational impact 
> > > > > has to also be considered and some flexibility
> > built-in.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > > > > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> > > > > Jonathan Charles
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:17 PM
> > > > > To: Ted Nugent
> > > > > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Serg; Andrew
> > Riley
> > > > > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 5 on VMWare
> > Server
> > > > > 1.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > What's really stupid here is that they offer
> > demo
> > > > > licenses for Unity,
> > 
> === message truncated ===>
> _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection 
> around http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.