[cisco-voip] trying outbound call on Centrex POTS lines

[Kevin Thorngren]

There is no provision within CCM to insert pauses into the dialed 
string.  If you were to use H.323 dial peers instead of MGCP you could 
manipulate the digits and insert commas (2 second pause for each comma 
I believe) into the dialed string.  So, you could still use the second 
pattern, without the additional 9, and have CCM send the call via H.323 
to the GW.  The matched dial peer can then prefix the number of commas 
needed for the delay to work.

Kevin
On May 10, 2006, at 4:25 PM, James Grace wrote:

> So  your first pattern should used the first 9 to access the lines… I 
> discard predot  and send 9+number (this could be 9+10 dig   or 9+1+10 
>   or 9+international dialing ).   So will I run into issues with just 
> sending 9+number over the the hosted site with out some type of pause 
> for delay for that ( 9 ).  Because this 9 allow the hosted site to 
> make the call out of there system
>  
>
> From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr at cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:57 PM
> To: James Grace
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] trying outbound call on Centrex POTS lines
>  
>
> Are you saying that the Centrex is expecting to see 9 + number for 
> outbound calls?
>
>  If so you have the flexibility of having the users dial 9 + 9 + 
> number (use a 9.9[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX pattern and predot discard) or 
> just 9 + number (use a 9[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX pattern and no digit 
> manipulation). You just need to make sure the CCM sends the 
> appropriate digits to the centrex.
>
>  Kevin
>  On May 10, 2006, at 3:36 PM, James Grace wrote:
> Hello we have a cm with 4 port fxo config as mgcp.  We are connecting 
> 4 Centrex POTS lines to the 2811 GW.  In the old system (Norstar)  I 
> believe the users had to hint the 9 to access to centrex lines  and 
> then a 9 again plus the rest of the number to dial out….  Since the 
> centrex is a hosted type solution,  what will be the best way to 
> config this with my cisco solution.  Will I have to tell the users to 
> do it the same way as before. 9….9 + number
>   
>  James D. Grace
> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
>  Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.
> Digitel Corporation
>   
>  _______________________________________________
>  cisco-voip mailing list
>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 4793 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060510/75be07bf/attachment.bin