[cisco-voip] What happens with Route Patterns that Contain Existing Extensions of CCM?

[Anthony Kouloglou]

Thanks a lot Ryan. That is (not) what i wanted to hear!!

Ryan Ratliff wrote:
> Nope.  In CM 3.x this would have worked but not in 4.0 and later.
>
> Just to make sure I understand you have a route pattern of 1XXX and a 
> dn of 1000 both in partition A.  Even if 1000 is unregistered it will 
> still be matched and any forwarding settings will kick in (or the 
> caller will hear reorder).   The call will never match the route 
> pattern if 1000 is not registered.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> if i configure a route pattern on ccm 4.1(3) with extensions that are
> registered on the ccm and route these route patterns
> over a voip gateway, what will happen?
>
> I have an SRST scenario in my mind and i want to know:
> when certain phones are not registered on the CCM, if CCM is going to
> try and route the call over the voip gateway (SRST) that is configured
> on that route pattern.
> In other words, can i have preference over patterns that are the same as
> the extensions configured on CCM?
>
> Thanks
> Anthony
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>