[cisco-voip] What happens with Route Patterns that Contain Existing Extensions of CCM?

[Anthony Kouloglou]

Thanks a lot Wes. That means that in 5.0 it would not work but in 5.1 it 
would since:
4.1->5.0 and
4.2->5.1
?
Is that correct? Because i have 4.1(3) and i was thinking in going in 
4.2 but then it would be unpossible to upgrade to 5.0.

Thanks

Wes Sisk wrote:
> in 4.2(3) and later you can use the 'forward unregistered' 
> configuration on the line to do what you are looking for.
>
> /Wes
>
> Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> if i configure a route pattern on ccm 4.1(3) with extensions that are 
>> registered on the ccm and route these route patterns
>> over a voip gateway, what will happen?
>>
>> I have an SRST scenario in my mind and i want to know:
>> when certain phones are not registered on the CCM, if CCM is going to 
>> try and route the call over the voip gateway (SRST) that is 
>> configured on that route pattern.
>> In other words, can i have preference over patterns that are the same 
>> as the extensions configured on CCM?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Anthony
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>   
>