[cisco-voip] What happens with Route Patterns that Contain Existing Extensions of CCM?

[Wes Sisk]

Anthony, correct.  4.2->5.1

Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
> Thanks a lot Wes. That means that in 5.0 it would not work but in 5.1 
> it would since:
> 4.1->5.0 and
> 4.2->5.1
> ?
> Is that correct? Because i have 4.1(3) and i was thinking in going in 
> 4.2 but then it would be unpossible to upgrade to 5.0.
>
> Thanks
>
> Wes Sisk wrote:
>> in 4.2(3) and later you can use the 'forward unregistered' 
>> configuration on the line to do what you are looking for.
>>
>> /Wes
>>
>> Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> if i configure a route pattern on ccm 4.1(3) with extensions that 
>>> are registered on the ccm and route these route patterns
>>> over a voip gateway, what will happen?
>>>
>>> I have an SRST scenario in my mind and i want to know:
>>> when certain phones are not registered on the CCM, if CCM is going 
>>> to try and route the call over the voip gateway (SRST) that is 
>>> configured on that route pattern.
>>> In other words, can i have preference over patterns that are the 
>>> same as the extensions configured on CCM?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>   
>>