[cisco-voip] Configuring dial-on-demand MLPP for remote site?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Yes, it's not as simple as just choosing one over the other, feature 
requirements definately are a part of the picture.

Let us know how it goes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Kulagowski" <bob at smalltime.com>
To: "cisco-voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Configuring dial-on-demand MLPP for remote site?


> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>> I also believe, and this is what I'm planning on, is you can use MGCP,
>> failover to H323 when you loose the WAN link and then establish the
>> dataconnection to keep going. Calls in progress are lost though.
>
> Well, we have H.323 setup now running 12.4.9T inorder to get call
> preservation, which works pretty well.  I don't think that we'll be
> switching to MGCP / H.323 fallback precisely because we don't want to
> drop calls.
>
> I've asked our Cisco SE if using SIP trunks will give us the benefits of
> caller name delivery _and_ call preservation in case of WAN failure.
> He's still getting back to me.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>