[cisco-voip] attendant console in remote SRST branch

Chris Soechting Chris at INXi.com
Tue Oct 17 22:03:11 EDT 2006


In SRST you can use translation profiles or alias to make the pilot
(1000) to ring to a phone.

 

Regards,

 

Chris Soechting, CCIE #15782 (Voice), CCSP

Sr. Consulting Engineer

INX Inc - InterNetwork Experts

7600 N. Capital of TX Highway

Bldg B, Ste 120

Austin, TX 78731

IP Phone: 512.795.7107

Fax: 512.795.8844

Email: chris at inxi.com <mailto:chris at inxi.com> 

Web: www.inxi.com <http://www.inxi.com/> 

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erik Erasmus
(E)
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:40 PM
To: Kris Seraphine
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] attendant console in remote SRST branch

 

Hi Kris

 

just to make sure - when you have a wan outage currently - do you have
no coverage for the main number at the remote site or not?

 

My concern is that because the attendant uses a pilot number and ac
users to cover for the main number that wehn the wan is down the pilot
number is gone and inbound calls will just not route into the site
because unless I can do something under srst to create the DN of the
main number - it will not exist really. Or am I missing something. Where
I did attendant console before at an HQ - I used as an example a pilot
of say 1000 for the main number of 431 1000 etc with ac1 user on
extension 5001 and ac2 user on 5002 as an example and then in the
huntgroup use ac1 and ac2 as members but 1000 does not appear on their
phones.

 

If one uses the same concept at a remote branch things will work like
you say when wan is up but when wan is down that pilot does not exist
and one also don't have that DN (the main pilot) on any phone so when
srst configures it does not know about the main number for that site
leaving us with a problem. I can live with not have the line states etc
etc while the wan is down - just need to somehow make the main number
reachable even if it is just on a single IP phone.

 

________________________________

From: Kris Seraphine [mailto:baryonyx5 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 2006-10-18 03:08
To: Erik Erasmus (E)
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] attendant console in remote SRST branch

Hi

I support a centralized cluster with 40+ remote sites; all of which use
the attendant console.  Most of the sites are under 50 phones but a few
are over 100.  The AC works pretty well over the WAN. The only problem
that we occasionaly have that I attribute to the WAN is that the parked
calls sometimes don't disappear when a call is picked up.  The only
reason I attribute this to a latency issue is that I don't see this
issue with any of my other customers who use the AC on the same LAN as
the servers.  This customer currently doesn't prioritize the AC flows
but that's in the works.  

As for WAN outages, you're pretty much out of luck.   There's no way to
preserve the AC functionality when the connection to the server is down.
You can route calls to dns using alias commands but line state, drag and
drop will be gone. 

The MPLS WAN has been very reliable with maybe 6-7 outages during work
hours over the last 12 months between all the sites.  Only one outage
was extended and that was the local telco's fault.  

On 10/17/06, Erik Erasmus (E) <ErasmuE4 at telkom.co.za> wrote: 

Hi

 

I have a scenario now where a customer wants to run an HQ and 5 remote
branches with a centralised call manager cluster and the branches on
srst across an MPLS IP wan. The problem is I have never proven the
viability of running the attendant console that comes with ccm 4-1/4-2
across a wan link. Looking for practical advise on workable solutions.

 

1. Has anyone deployed this with success - how heavy is attendant
console on bandwidth (assume we can configure propper QoS) - say 100
users in the branch

 

2. My biggest concern is what happens when the branch goes into srst
mode. How does one then cover for the pilot number for the specific
site. Normally when doing it at an HQ I use the approach where I create
the ac1, ac2 users etc for attendants and the pilot dn is the main
number like xxx 1000 etc. if one now configure ac users for the remote
site/s each with their own pilot number things should work Ok with the
WAN up but not sure how to provide cover for the main number when srst
kicks in and the entire attendant solution goes down. The branch can not
afford having the main pilot number un attended during a wan failure.

 

 

Not using attendant console also poses a problem for a big branch with
100 plus users with high inbound call volumes to the site. Simply
putting a 7960 down with an expansion module or two will not do it. The
attendants won't be able to effectively handle high call volumes, no
drag and drop, now line state info etc.

 

Any advise will be appreciated.

 

erik erasmus

Telkom SA Ltd

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at 
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






-- 
kris seraphine 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at 
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
	
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061017/64616f25/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list