[cisco-voip] [Semi-OT] E911 and legal issues
Craig M Staffin
CMStaffin at ra.rockwell.com
Fri Sep 1 10:07:10 EDT 2006
Check with the local PSAP. As far as I know Chicago is the only city that
has and actually enforces an E911 law.
Also from my understanding you can make 911 ring to an internal team first
as long as it is posted so that the employees understand that that is in
fact what is happening.
Craig
Netfortius <netfortius at gmail.com>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
08/31/2006 08:47 PM
Please respond to
netfortius at gmail.com
To
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
cc
Subject
[cisco-voip] [Semi-OT] E911 and legal issues
Sorry for the off-topic, but google-ing around didn't reveal much to me,
so
here it goes: has any one of the members of this list implemented an E911
solution? I have a client who needs this installed, but we do not know if
the
configuration has to be related to legal aspects in the state/county/town
the
company resides in. Here is what I am referring to:
- under the old, analog system, the methodology of calling 911 had the
number
actually routed to an emergency crew, properly trained in CPR and other
first
emergency responder methods, who would then decide if the call had to
really
go to 911. One of the big advantages of this method was also the fact that
the internal crew had full knowledge of the location of each person, to
the
cube and office level
- someone I was discussing this issue with said to me that the above was
only
possible under very old laws, allowing such, and that the new laws require
911 calls to be sent directly to the 911 services, and that the location
will
have to be passed on based on the information from a database my customer
will have to deliver (and maintain?!?) in coordination with the 911 folks,
such that each phone will be identified in a specifc area of the building,
based on participation in a switch-port connection. To me this sounds
extreme, because one of the advnatages VoIP has been bringin to the table
was ... well ... mobility of phones (no matter where I plug them, they
register) - so how the heck are we going to be able to continuously update
the switch-port info?!?
Any pointers will be highly appreciated - to narrow the scope I would be
mostly interested in USA - Illinois, but of course other states'
deployment
experience will also be valuable.
If you feel the above is totally off-topic, please accept my apologies,
and -
if anythiung useful to be added - please email me directly.
Thank you,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060901/2da56e81/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list