[cisco-voip] Caller-id and name debugging

[Robert Kulagowski]

bababooey at cox.net wrote:
>>From the Voice-GW, debug q931. This is a call from CCm to PBX.
> Where is the calling name supposed to be?

RX <- SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1E2C
         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                 Standard = CCITT
                 Transfer Capability = Speech
                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
         Channel ID i = 0xA98382
                 Exclusive, Channel 2
         Facility i = 0x9F8B0100A10F02017606072A8648CE1500040A0100
                 Protocol Profile =  Networking Extensions
                 0xA10F02017606072A8648CE1500040A0100
                 Component = Invoke component
                         Invoke Id = 118
                         Operation = InformationFollowing (calling_name)
                                 Name information in subsequent FACILITY 
message
         Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '<snip>'
                 Plan:ISDN, Type:National
         Called Party Number i = 0x80, '<snip>'
                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
Sep 25 13:35:48.820: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: RX <- FACILITY pd = 8 
callref = 0x1E2C
         Facility i = 
0x9F8B0100A117020177020100800F544453202020202020202020202020
                 Protocol Profile =  Networking Extensions
                 0xA117020177020100800F544453202020202020202020202020
                 Component = Invoke component
                         Invoke Id = 119
                         Operation = CallingName
                                 Name presentation allowed
                                 Name = TDS
Sep 25 13:35:48.856: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 
callref = 0x9E2C
         Channel ID i = 0xA98382
                 Exclusive, Channel 2
Sep 25 13:35:48.856: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX -> ALERTING pd = 8 
callref = 0x9E2C
         Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available

=======

 From your example it doesn't look like calling name is being delivered, 
and in mine the calling name was "TDS".  But watch your debug for a 
little while and make sure that the one example you sent wasn't a fluke. 
  If you're consistently not getting it, tell your provider.