[cisco-voip] Trace file size's and server load CCM 3.2(3)

Fedorov, Konstantin kfedor at amt.ru
Thu Apr 19 11:22:42 EDT 2007


Hi,

Some time ago, some Cisco TAC Engineer ( unfortunately donn't remember) 
Said, that if you turn on all debugs in the detailed level you couldn't
notice any performance degradation.

I believe :) 

-----------------------
Sincerely Yours,
Konstantin Fedorov

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnny Crothers [mailto:Johnny.Crothers at vanco.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:13 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff
Cc: Fedorov, Konstantin; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Trace file size's and server load CCM 3.2(3)

Yeah so I've seen :) Just trying to get an idea on the disk space needed
for when I turn these traces on and what sort of performance impact its
going to have on these servers.

Customer wants to know before I can go ahead and do it... they want
specifics :) yay!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Sent: 19 April 2007 16:08
To: Johnny Crothers
Cc: Fedorov, Konstantin; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Trace file size's and server load CCM 3.2(3)

Ugh, don't bother using XML traces.  The parser isn't that good and  
if you ever have to send anything to TAC we'll just ask you turn it  
off and reproduce the problem.

-Ryan

On Apr 19, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Johnny Crothers wrote:

Cool, thanks.. So I'm assuming that the XML file size will be the  
same as the .txt size? If so, shouldn't be too hard to work out.


Any ideas on the resource consumption when enabling traces?




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list