[cisco-voip] Trace file size's and server load CCM 3.2(3)

[Ryan Ratliff]

There will be a bit of a performance hit, but unless you are already  
pushing your server (or running 5.0.4) you probably won't even notice.

-Ryan

On Apr 19, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Fedorov, Konstantin wrote:

Hi,

Some time ago, some Cisco TAC Engineer ( unfortunately donn't remember)
Said, that if you turn on all debugs in the detailed level you couldn't
notice any performance degradation.

I believe :)

-----------------------
Sincerely Yours,
Konstantin Fedorov

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnny Crothers [mailto:Johnny.Crothers at vanco.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:13 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff
Cc: Fedorov, Konstantin; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Trace file size's and server load CCM 3.2(3)

Yeah so I've seen :) Just trying to get an idea on the disk space needed
for when I turn these traces on and what sort of performance impact its
going to have on these servers.

Customer wants to know before I can go ahead and do it... they want
specifics :) yay!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: 19 April 2007 16:08
To: Johnny Crothers
Cc: Fedorov, Konstantin; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Trace file size's and server load CCM 3.2(3)

Ugh, don't bother using XML traces.  The parser isn't that good and
if you ever have to send anything to TAC we'll just ask you turn it
off and reproduce the problem.

-Ryan

On Apr 19, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Johnny Crothers wrote:

Cool, thanks.. So I'm assuming that the XML file size will be the
same as the .txt size? If so, shouldn't be too hard to work out.


Any ideas on the resource consumption when enabling traces?