[cisco-voip] ccm and Service Provider PAT Port AllocationEnhancement for RTP and RTCP

Voll, Scott Scott.Voll at wesd.org
Fri Apr 20 13:33:31 EDT 2007


The reason for two Ethernet ports is for Teaming on the same subnet for
redundancy.  This is the only TAC supported use of two Ethernet ports.

 

Two options as I see it.

 

1.                   get the cisco SCCP phone proxy appliance

or

2.                   setup an IPSEC tunnel between the sites

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: gokhan senol [mailto:gokhanciscottl at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:55 PM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ccm and Service Provider PAT Port
AllocationEnhancement for RTP and RTCP

 

yes i use 2 ethernet ports. 

Why it is not supported and if it is not supported why there are 2
ethernet ports?

 

also if it is not supported then i must  nat CCM ethernet on the
firewall.

but the question is for rtp streams how can i make nat for ip phones. i
cant make nat config by specifiying  rtp port range. 

fw makes nat only using ip , firewall doesnt look source port during
nat.

but we know rtp ports 16384 32767 . and nat config must use these ports

 

thanks 

----- Original Message ----
From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
To: gokhan senol <gokhanciscottl at yahoo.com>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:10:44 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] ccm and Service Provider PAT Port
AllocationEnhancement for RTP and RTCP

If I understand correctly you are using two Ethernet ports on your CM.
This is not supported.

 

If I misunderstand my apologies.

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of gokhan senol
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:18 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ccm and Service Provider PAT Port
AllocationEnhancement for RTP and RTCP

 

hi

 

design : ccm 4.1.3  have 2 ip address one private and the other one
public.

private ip is behind the firewall.

 

i gave public ip address to CCM for 2nd ethernet and putted the beyond
the firewall .also I  added a new h323 gateway  for voip service
provider's h323 gateway .

when i try to make a call from voip provider's backbone the remote side
ringins but there is no audio ,

because there is no rtp stream from my ip phone. Because ip phones have
private ip

so is it ok if i nat the ip phones on my internet router?

also i read a documents related to Service Provider PAT Port Allocation
Enhancement for RTP and RTCP   and session border control ..

how to i nat ipphones .  

can  i use the config example in the document below in my INTERNET
router?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6640/products_white_paper0900aecd8
0597bc7.shtml

 

thanks a  lot

Gokhan

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http:/autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_
ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM-
>  

 

 

________________________________

Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http:/autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_
ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM-
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070420/ec0e0be8/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list