[cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists-makes sense?

[Voll, Scott]

Should NOT.. sorry

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:47 AM
To: Jonathan Charles; Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI
exists-makes sense?

 

As far as CM would know it's still 911 weather they transfer you or not.
I wouldn't think this should be an issue.

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:44 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists
-makes sense?

 

Yes and no.

Here's the problem.

Let's say a user calls 911, and the operator transfers them to a poison
control unit or a CPR expert and it is just a local number... there is a
possibility that the MLPP would not recognize this as an emergency call
and bump it. 

However, this may be an urban legend...



Jonathan

On 4/30/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote:

MLLP would take care of this, correct?

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

	----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Jonathan Charles <mailto:jonvoip at gmail.com>  

	To: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>  

	Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 

	Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:36 AM

	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI
exists - makes sense?

	 

	Actually, we put in a few analogs so we can dedicate circuits
for 911...
	
	While Scott's argument makes sense, it misses the fact that most
PRIs are heavily oversubscribed.
	
	
	
	Jonathan

	On 4/30/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 

	Just wondering if anyone can help me justify ordering a couple
of analog lines for 911 service which will go into the same router and
be serviced by the same local telephone switch and likely be carried
over the same path as the PRIs. I already have two single port PRI cards
to protect against single point of failure of the PRI card. But in the
end, if the router goes down, it's down. 

	 

	Anyone ever see a PRI port go down but FXO ports stay up?

	 

	
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
	Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
	Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1
	(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
	
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
	...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

	
	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

	 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070430/f0caca12/attachment-0001.html