[cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation Award!!!

[Christopher M. Bomba]

Yes, I had it working when I left, I could call the office phone, which in turn rang my cell phone.  I could answer my cell phone walk up to my desk, hang up with the caller and pick the call up on my office phone.  Works, but I just don't see having someone spend money for a MCS server and software for that functionality.  I am glad it is integrated with CUCM 6.0.

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Sent: Thu, August 30, 2007 3:34 pm
To: Craig Staffin <craig at staffin.org>, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
Cc: cbomba at s4nets.com, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation Award!!!

Yes, works fine. It's more the 1 call in, 4 calls out that uses PRI
resources.  Need to plan Erlang type stats carefully..

 

It would be better if the CMMUser was more simple like Vonage simulcast
website, etc.

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Craig Staffin
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 3:13 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: cbomba at s4nets.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation Award!!!

 

now the real question has anyone actually gotten the mobility features
to work correctly??

On 8/30/07, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com > wrote:

CM6, mobility manager is included natively.  /Wes

Christopher M. Bomba wrote: 

I had to install Mobility Manager last year when it was still pretty new
and when I called TAC the engineer asked me to send him the document
because they sent me to a TAC engineer that hadn't even seen CMM yet.
After working with the guy for a full day they finally escalated to
someone that knew what they were talking about and I got it working.
The documentation was Poo back then and haven't dealt with it since, but
I guess people didn't complain enough to have them go back and rework
the docs.  I was glad to get that behind me.  




Can't wait to see what we have to do to get that functionality working
in CUCM 6.0.  It is built into the software now, no need for separate
server.



Chris





Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:47:22 -0500


From: Robert Kulagowski <bob at smalltime.com> <mailto:bob at smalltime.com> 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation
        Award!!!
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <46D586FA.8070604 at smalltime.com>
<mailto:46D586FA.8070604 at smalltime.com> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 
Ted Nugent wrote:
  

	Ahh yes however once you finally do track down the
	
	Unity Doc you need its typically pretty good.
	
	
	
	For instance they wouldn't call a DN (Distinguished
	
	Name) a Directory Number like they do in the CMM
	
	
	docs..
	
	    

You are in a twisty maze of passageways, all alike...







_______________________________________________

cisco-voip mailing list

<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




-- 
Craig Staffin
Craig at staffin.org
(H) 262-437-7313
(C) 262-613-6003 




-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.