[cisco-voip] Documentation for 7961/7941

Ed Leatherman ealeatherman at gmail.com
Fri Jan 12 15:54:31 EST 2007


Has cisco ever indicated when they might EOS the 7960's? My concern with the
7960s is future compatilibity with newer basic features.. if I deploy 200
more sets next month and use 7960's, will I be replacing 3/4 of them in 2
years anyway with 7961's? Seems like they were barely able to squeeze BLF's
onto them for CCM5.

I can imagine Lelio's head popping if they decided to let you forward
non-primary lines from the phone but only on the 7961 and up ;)

On 1/12/07, Simon, Bill <bills at tns.its.psu.edu> wrote:
>
> The latest IP Phone Services SDK doesn't seem to mention the 7961/7941,
> but talks about the 7940/7960, 7905/12, and 7970.
>
> Is the 7961/41 more similar to the 7970 - due to its operating
> system/firmware - than the 7960, at least in the area of IP phone
> services?
>
> There seem to be many inconsistencies (thanks Lelio for pointing some
> out) between the 7960 and 7961, making it difficult to write phone
> services that work the same for both models.  Need more documentation!
>
> Bill
>
> PS: for anyone thinking of going to 7961 for its bells and whistles,
> instead of purchasing 7960 (still available!) - don't rush into it.  In
> our experience the 7960 is rock solid and outperforms the 7961.  It's
> "faster" (boot time, response time, dialing time) and practically bug
> free.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>



-- 
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070112/e2154f5b/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list