[cisco-voip] Does 12.4(11)T now do H.323 to H.320 conversions?

[Robert Kulagowski]

OK, that means that this is actually a pretty interesting feature.

I don't think I've heard of a "video" PRI that supports bonded 
b-channels.  How is that different than a regular PRI?  Does this mean 
that I need to call MaBell and get the provisioning changed for my voice 
PRI to start experimenting?

Ideally, at a remote site, I'd like to get away from having to get BRIs 
for our Polycoms and just connect them to the LAN and use the existing 
PRIs on the router when we need to make a call.

Polycom FX (H.323) -- IOS -- PRI

Does CM need to get involved at all?  ie, would I define the Polycom as 
a H.323 device?  Internally, I got Video Advantage to make IP calls to 
the Polycom without too much trouble, but like I mentioned, there's lots 
of assumptions in the document I linked to.

I also had to open a TAC case (605137135) which resulted in ddts's 
because of errors in the docs.