[cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?
Craig M Staffin
cmstaffin at ra.rockwell.com
Wed Jan 31 14:04:51 EST 2007
Paul
you are correct
T1 PRI is 23B+1D
E1 PRI is 30B+2D
T1 CAS however is 24B
E1 CAS is still 30B if I remember correctly
Craig
Paul Choi <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
01/31/2007 01:32 PM
To
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
cc
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?
--- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:
> If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for
> 24 channels, why on the second PRI when I run the
> pri-group timeslots command it tells me I don't have
> enough resources and I can only configure 24
> channels?
Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS to
have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines. I'd
like to hear any clarification on this.
If you're using standard sig, you should have 46
bearer channels for voice and two delta channels, no?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Have a burning question?
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070131/72a47219/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list