[cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?

[Wydra, Jason]

Sorry. That's what I  meant. 23B +1D. Still not reason I can't get full capacity from a PVDM2-48 with two PRIs (that I know of).

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Craig M Staffin
Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 1:04 PM
To: Paul Choi
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?



Paul 

you are correct 

T1 PRI is 23B+1D 
E1 PRI is 30B+2D 

T1 CAS however is 24B 
E1 CAS is still 30B if I remember correctly 

Craig





Paul Choi <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 

01/31/2007 01:32 PM 

To
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
cc
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?	

		





--- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:

> If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for
> 24 channels, why on the second PRI when I run the
> pri-group timeslots command it tells me I don't have
> enough resources and I can only configure 24
> channels?

Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS to
have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines. I'd
like to hear any clarification on this.

If you're using standard sig, you should have 46
bearer channels for voice and two delta channels, no?



____________________________________________________________________________________
Have a burning question?  
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip