[cisco-voip] Multicast SRST, branch router, no moh for PSTN caller
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
Wed Jun 6 10:31:32 EDT 2007
I think your redundancy assumptions are correct. The whole setup for
this multicast MOH is a little tricky. It would be great if Cisco could
make it a bit easier. I actually came into an existing environment where
they had about 8 audio sources enabled for multicast. I created a dummy
audio file for this purpose and disabled all the others that were
multicasting. Even though all other audio sources were not multicasting
and my audio file was audio source 2 the ulaw stream was being sent from
239.1.1.5 and not 239.1.1.1 as anticipated.(base of 239.1.1.1 on MOH
server).
After performing some maintenance about a week ago and resetting all the
CM servers guess what?? The multicast stream address changed to 239.1.1.1
!!!
I had to go back to about 8 gateways and change the multicast address to
get them working again. I'm guessing that the audio 1 source file was
previously multicast enabled and the changes didn't take affect until the
reboot.
Carlos
Robert Kulagowski <bob at smalltime.com>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
06/06/2007 10:16 AM
To
Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
cc
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Multicast SRST, branch router, no moh for PSTN caller
Ryan Ratliff wrote:
> I'm pretty sure CM will increment the port/IP address of the MOH
> stream going from ulaw to alaw. Since you can only stream to one
> multicast IP address/port from the router you need to make sure every
> endpoint that needs to listen to that MOH source is using the same
> codec.
I know for a fact that it does; I just ran into this issue in Sydney,
where I put a alaw file on the router and discovered that my MOH didn't
work. When I looked at sh ccm-manager music-on-hold I realized that it
was coming from 239.1.1.2 port 16384 instead of 239.1.1.1 and had to
update my config.
However, this configuration is brittle in that 1) I can't put 239.1.1.2
on more than one MOH source on CM because CM then complains that the IP
is already in use and/or 2) I don't think that I can wildcard the IP
address (but keep a fixed port on the router multicast moh config), so
if a CM goes bye-bye and the phones register to another CM this is going
to fail, correct?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070606/47f7a753/attachment-0001.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list