[cisco-voip] H.323 Gateway PRI selection
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Wed Jun 6 16:26:13 EDT 2007
Calling name is a strange animal. As far as I know, in the US, calling name is delivered to the called party by the called party's provider after doing an SS7 directory lookup. Now I'm not sure if this is bypassed if you actually send a calling name or not.
In Canada, it is up to the calling party to send the calling name information.
I'm sure this is one reason why CallManager does not have a "external calling name" field in the route patterns, etc.
This is a shame for those of us in Canada who use PRI/Megalink service and want only one name to be sent out. The telco's here can not program the calling name on the service.
It's not as bad as not being able to forward secondary lines, but I get strange looks from people saying we can't get outbound calling name.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR
----- Original Message -----
From: Linsemier, Matthew
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] H.323 Gateway PRI selection
I forgot to mention CSS but I was thinking along the same lines you were. The only issue that you may run into if you want to drop PRI's is calling name. It's really easy to send whatever number you want to telco and have them send it on (haven't you ever accidently put in the wrong number mask and your customers think your insurance company is Bob's Truck Stop), but calling name is a different story. Good luck in convincing them to add different entries based on the number you send over one PRI even though I know feasibly it can be done in their database.
Matt
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:08 PM
To: CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H.323 Gateway PRI selection
Then I would follow Gurpinder's idea, but rather then letting the user select, use calling search spaces so that the appropriate route pattern was automatically selected.
Then, each route pattern could append a prefix that would match the appropriate dial-peer.
I would consider removing call screening on the PRIs and leave it up to the dial-peers to set the callerID. You might be able to drop the number of PRIs you need.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR
----- Original Message -----
From: CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net ; cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H.323 Gateway PRI selection
Basically I need 3 different groups of users always to use their designated PRI's so that the correct caller ID is presented. Think of it as 3 companies sharing one gateway, each desginated to a PRI with that companies name and number on it.
In response to the Gurpinder's post....I do not need them to select which caller id they want to use. Each of the 3 groups will always use the same caller ID. I had an idea similar to yours to prepend digits so that when the call gets to the gateway I know which PRI it needs to exit from. I just want to make sure I don't miss an easier method.
Carlos
"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
06/06/2007 03:50 PM
To
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>, <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
cc
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] H.323 Gateway PRI selection
Wouldn't you do this with the dial-peers?
There is a caller ID config statement that you can configure, then select the appropriate port.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR
----- Original Message -----
From: CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 2:24 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] H.323 Gateway PRI selection
We have a new H.323 Gateway that will have 4 PRI's. 2 PRI's will be grouped together and present one caller ID. Each of the remaining 2 PRI's will have their own caller ID (3 total different Caller ID's). How can you select a specific PRI to be used so that the correct caller ID is shown depending on which phone dials outboud? I should be able to prepend a digit on Call Mgr to the 3 different route patterns (different partitions) and then route the call based on the leading digit found on the H.323 GW. I know I can do this via MGCP easily as well. Any other good ideas or thoughts about this via H.323?
Carlos
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070606/f3f23b9b/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list