[cisco-voip] IP Addressing Scheme for IPT

[Erik Erasmus (E)]

It is More common to allocate separate subnets - even separate vlans
per area for very large buildings for IPt users.
It is also a good idea to have a separate server vlan/s for IPt
servers like ccm, unity etc to create a nice trust boundary to make
the IPt servers more secure




Cisco has docs explaining the pros and cons and ways to use exuisting
addresses if one has to - think it is in the SRND for IP t


Erik Erasmus 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of STEVEN CASPER
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:13 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Addressing Scheme for IPT

Hello all,
 We currently allocate subnets/IP addresses for voice VLANs from the
same 10.0.0.0 network as we allocate subnets for data VLANS. Is this a
common practice or is it more common to use a separate private address
space such as the 192 or 172 networks for voice VLANS and if so why?




Thanks!,

Steve Casper
Voice Technologies
M&T Bank
(410) 347-6026

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at 
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~