[cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby

[CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com]

That would definitely be the goal.  I try not to introduce anything that 
TAC would have a field day with.

Carlos



"Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 
03/20/2007 01:20 PM

To
"CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com" <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
cc
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby






Just so you know, the HA servers should be of the same class and ideally 
the same processor...



Jonathan

On 3/20/07, CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com <
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> wrote:

Yeah, this is not a new implementation.  They are currently running 200 
agents on the existing 7845.  I just wanted to find a stable version to 
recommend instituting the HA setup. 

Carlos 


"Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
03/19/2007 05:31 PM 


To
"CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com" <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> 
cc
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby








I would scale your CRS Engine boxes as 7845s for that number of agents... 
The goal here is that one server should support the total (so, a loss of a 
server won't take you out).



Jonathan

On 3/19/07, CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com <
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com > wrote: 

I knew I forgot something.  How many agents have you seen this run 
successfully with?  We currently have about 200.   Have you had any 
problems with this system or has it always been working smoothly? 

Carlos 

"Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com > 
03/19/2007 04:05 PM 


To
" CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com " <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com > 
cc
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby










Easy enough, you install the first node, then it prompts you to install 
the second... install the engine on the two, make sure you use the same 
profile... easy as pie.

Go with 4.0(5) and OS 2000.4.3aSR9...


Jonathan

On 3/19/07, CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com < 
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> wrote: 

Has anyone configured this setup?  If so could you describe your setup? 

IPCC version (and SR if applicable) 
OS version 
Any known problems or gotchas and what you did to fix them (if it was 
fixed) 

I am working at a shop where they they have heard bad things about the 
IPCC failover setup.  This was probably about 8 months ago so I am hoping 
to hear some success stories and better stability for this setup now. 

Carlos 

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070320/74ac35a6/attachment.html