[cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby

[Jonathan Charles]

Feh, just don't tell them... they usually don't figure it out unless they
are looking for a reason not to help...


Jonathan

On 3/20/07, CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com <
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> wrote:
>
>
> That would definitely be the goal.  I try not to introduce anything that
> TAC would have a field day with.
>
> Carlos
>
>
>  *"Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>*
>
> 03/20/2007 01:20 PM
>   To
> "CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com" <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>  cc
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>  Subject
> Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Just so you know, the HA servers should be of the same class and ideally
> the same processor...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 3/20/07, *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com*<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com><
> *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, this is not a new implementation.  They are currently running 200
> agents on the existing 7845.  I just wanted to find a stable version to
> recommend instituting the HA setup.
>
> Carlos
>
>   *"Jonathan Charles" <**jonvoip at gmail.com* <jonvoip at gmail.com>*>*
> Sent by: *cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net*<cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
>
> 03/19/2007 05:31 PM
>
>   To
> "*CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>" <*
> CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>  cc
> *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>  Subject
> Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would scale your CRS Engine boxes as 7845s for that number of agents...
> The goal here is that one server should support the total (so, a loss of a
> server won't take you out).
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 3/19/07, *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com *<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
> <*CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> >
> wrote:
>
> I knew I forgot something.  How many agents have you seen this run
> successfully with?  We currently have about 200.   Have you had any problems
> with this system or has it always been working smoothly?
>
> Carlos
>   *"Jonathan Charles" <**jonvoip at gmail.com* <jonvoip at gmail.com> *>*
>
> 03/19/2007 04:05 PM
>
>   To
> "* CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> "
> <*CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com * <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>
> cc
> *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>  Subject
> Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Easy enough, you install the first node, then it prompts you to install
> the second... install the engine on the two, make sure you use the same
> profile... easy as pie.
>
> Go with 4.0(5) and OS 2000.4.3aSR9...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 3/19/07, *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com *<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
> <* CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Has anyone configured this setup?  If so could you describe your setup?
>
> IPCC version (and SR if applicable)
> OS version
> Any known problems or gotchas and what you did to fix them (if it was
> fixed)
>
> I am working at a shop where they they have heard bad things about the
> IPCC failover setup.  This was probably about 8 months ago so I am hoping to
> hear some success stories and better stability for this setup now.
>
> Carlos
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list*
> **cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> *
> **https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip *<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list*
> **cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>*
> **https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip*<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070320/42b7ff17/attachment-0001.html