[cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby

Craig Staffin craig at staffin.org
Tue Mar 20 15:51:07 EST 2007


TAC why would they look for a reason not to help :)

On 3/20/07, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Feh, just don't tell them... they usually don't figure it out unless they
> are looking for a reason not to help...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 3/20/07, CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com <
> CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > That would definitely be the goal.  I try not to introduce anything that
> > TAC would have a field day with.
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >  *"Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>*
> >
> > 03/20/2007 01:20 PM
> >   To
> > "CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com " <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
> > cc
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >  Subject
> > Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Just so you know, the HA servers should be of the same class and ideally
> > the same processor...
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On 3/20/07, *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com *<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com><
> > *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, this is not a new implementation.  They are currently running 200
> > agents on the existing 7845.  I just wanted to find a stable version to
> > recommend instituting the HA setup.
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >   *"Jonathan Charles" <**jonvoip at gmail.com* <jonvoip at gmail.com> *>*
> > Sent by: *cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net *<cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
> >
> > 03/19/2007 05:31 PM
> >
> >   To
> > " *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>"
> > <*CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>
> > cc
> > *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>  Subject
> > Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would scale your CRS Engine boxes as 7845s for that number of
> > agents... The goal here is that one server should support the total (so, a
> > loss of a server won't take you out).
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On 3/19/07, *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com *<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
> > <*CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com * <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I knew I forgot something.  How many agents have you seen this run
> > successfully with?  We currently have about 200.   Have you had any problems
> > with this system or has it always been working smoothly?
> >
> > Carlos
> >   *"Jonathan Charles" <**jonvoip at gmail.com* <jonvoip at gmail.com> *>*
> >
> > 03/19/2007 04:05 PM
> >
> >   To
> > " * CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>" <
> > *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com * <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>
> > cc
> > *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>  Subject
> > Re: [cisco-voip] IPCC 4.X Hot Standby
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Easy enough, you install the first node, then it prompts you to install
> > the second... install the engine on the two, make sure you use the same
> > profile... easy as pie.
> >
> > Go with 4.0(5) and OS 2000.4.3aSR9...
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On 3/19/07, *CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com *<CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>
> > <* CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com* <CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone configured this setup?  If so could you describe your setup?
> >
> > IPCC version (and SR if applicable)
> > OS version
> > Any known problems or gotchas and what you did to fix them (if it was
> > fixed)
> >
> > I am working at a shop where they they have heard bad things about the
> > IPCC failover setup.  This was probably about 8 months ago so I am hoping to
> > hear some success stories and better stability for this setup now.
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list*
> > **cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> *
> > **https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip *<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list*
> > **cisco-voip at puck.nether.net* <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> *
> > **https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip *<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Craig Staffin
Craig at staffin.org
(H) 262-437-7313
(C) 262-613-6003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070320/60109897/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list