[cisco-voip] CM 4.1(3)SR5

[Jonathan Charles]

I just had this happen to me two days ago.

The customer had recently moved and wanted to retain their DIDs...
so... they waived 911 service on their PRI, so 911 calls failed.

Instead they were using an analog line for 911.



Jonathan

On 5/24/07, Derek Hover <Derek.Hover at apptis.com> wrote:
>
> Now that it's out, anyone taking a stick to it yet?
>
> Derek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Charles
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:13 PM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Unallocated/Unassigned Number for 911 call...
>
> So, made a 911 test call:
>
> VOICEGW#
> *May 24 18:13:39.451: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8
> callref = 0x004D
>         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
>                 Standard = CCITT
>                 Transfer Capability = Speech
>                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
>                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>         Channel ID i = 0xA98394
>                 Exclusive, Channel 20
>         Calling Party Number i = 0x0181, '[removed]'
>                 Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
>         Called Party Number i = 0x80, '911'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
> *May 24 18:13:39.527: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
> callref = 0x804D
>         Cause i = 0x8081 - Unallocated/unassigned number
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>