[cisco-voip] Cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r vs. Cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
Michael Thompson
mthompson729 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 7 12:59:06 EST 2007
This has been a topic for multiple threads. the big advantage of the
871 is that you can do bandwidth management between you and the
internet connection. the advantage is that if you have kids using the
internet as you're on the phone, you can control the peer to peer
trafffic and queue / shape for peak work application performance. It
will also allow you to make sure that non-priority apps (outlook, SAP,
FTP, etc) don't overtake your bandwidth.
my 2 cents, but I'm very partial to the 871 for this solution.
On Nov 1, 2007 3:53 PM, Robert Kulagowski <rkulagow at gmail.com> wrote:
> Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations? We
> currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but
> there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and
> g.729). Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.
>
> From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all traffic
> over the Internet (control and voice), correct?
>
> Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a full-blown
> VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list