[cisco-voip] ata188 why EOL?

[Ted Nugent]

No its not on CCO apparently..

On Nov 21, 2007 3:08 PM, Adam <cisco at adman.net> wrote:
> Do you have a link to information about the VG202/204? I can't find any
> reference to it on Cisco's website.
>
> -Adam
>
>
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 11:59 AM, Ted Nugent < tednugent73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The VG202/204 has 2 FE ports but my guess is since they model the
> > vg224 they are routed ports and not switched ports like the ATA. Can
> > anyone confirm this?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2007 9:26 AM, Robert <rsingleton at morsco.com > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 07:15 -0700, Mike Glass wrote:
> > > > To answer your question.
> > > > My SE said that Cisco has EOL'ed these due to poor sales, the 186 have
> > > > a much higher sale rate, and really dont need 100mb for an analog
> > > > device.
> > >
> > > What I miss is the built-in switch port. ATA-188's are great to deploy
> > > for a fax/network printer...
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>