[cisco-voip] ata188 why EOL?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

interesting...makes sense why the dropped one and not the other.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Glass 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:15 AM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ata188 why EOL?


  To answer your question.
  My SE said that Cisco has EOL'ed these due to poor sales, the 186 have a much higher sale rate, and really dont need 100mb for an analog device.

  >>> "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 11/19/2007 2:05 PM >>>

  anyone know why they EOL'ed the ata188s? especially without a replacement?

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
  Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
  (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
  "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."      WJR


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071121/370251ca/attachment.html