[cisco-voip] R: Very Strange Behaviour

[zohaib shabir]

Actually gateways are registered to the cluster not to individual CM, At
least this is the case in CM 4.X but from your working it seems in CM
5.Xthis has changed. I have in my environment both CM
4.2 registered to gateway and it works with or without using the preference
command, so probably i think there is a change in behavior as far as i can
tell in CM 5x

On 10/4/07, Alessandro Bertacco <alessandro.bertacco at lanservice.it> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> i can give my contribution...
>
> I've a similar situation with central site with one publiser and one
> subscriber.
>
> All phone registered on the subscriber
>
> The remote SRTS gateway of the brranch office configured with two dialpeer
> pointing subscriber and publisher, but WITH OUT preference.
>
> That's works fine in my network
>
> Let me know
>
> Regards
> Alessandro
>
>  ------------------------------
> *Da:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *Per conto di *Jordi Riba (Europe)
> *Inviato:* giovedì 4 ottobre 2007 14.14
> *A:* zohaib shabir
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Oggetto:* Re: [cisco-voip] Very Strange Behaviour
>
>  Hi Zohaib
>
> But, what about if I only want to have a voip dial-peer pointing to my
> publisher? That situation was not working either.
>
> Does the way you configure VOIP dial-peers depends to which CCM (Publisher
> or Subscriber) is a gateway registered to?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jordi!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *De:* zohaib shabir [mailto:zohaibshabir at gmail.com]
> *Enviado el:* jue 04/10/2007 14:02
> *Para:* Jordi Riba (Europe)
> *CC:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Asunto:* Re: [cisco-voip] Very Strange Behaviour
>
> What you should do is to change the preference of the dial-peer pointing
> to the publisher to preference 1 or above. It will work hopefully.
>
> On 10/4/07, Jordi Riba (Europe) <Jordi.Riba at eu.didata.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Hi all,
> >
> > I'm gonna try to explain a very strange situation/behaviour I found
> > yesterday in a customer site... I think this is not the way it should work
> > but ... I would like some of you to re-check it.
> >
> > Thanks in advance...
> >
> >
> > Initial Situation:
> > - CCM 5.1.2
> > - One headquarters office. (CCM Cluster on it 1 publisher - 3
> > subscribers)
> > - Three branchoffices (h323-srst gateway on them) (12.4.9-T3)
> > - All phones and gateways in the branch are registerd to the publisher.
> > - Route-patterns and route-list registered to the publisher too.
> > - Gateways in the branch offices have two voip dialpeer (one pointing to
> > the publisher (precedence 1)  and another pointing to one subscriber
> > (precedence 2))
> >
> > Action Done:
> > Changed callmanager group in the branch offices device pool to get
> > branch gateways and phones registered to a subscriber CCM.
> >
> > Problem:
> > After this change, Call coming from the PSTN to the gateway can not
> > contact IP Phones. In q931 debug we get a "Network out of order" message.
> >
> > Workaround:
> > If we deactivate the voice dialpeer pointing to the Publisher --> We
> > work only with the dialpeer pointing to the subscriber. All works fine.
> >
> > If we deactivate the voice dialpeer pointing to the Subscriber --> We
> > work only with the dialpeer pointing to the Publisher. We get network out of
> > order.
> >
> > I think this is not the way it should work, is it??
> >
> > Thanks again,
> >
> > Jordi!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Zohaib Shabir
> Network Engineer(Voice)
> DWP Group, TECH Division
> Ph:+92-302-8232689
>



-- 
Regards,
Zohaib Shabir
Network Engineer(Voice)
DWP Group, TECH Division
Ph:+92-302-8232689
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071004/da703317/attachment.html