[cisco-voip] R: Very Strange Behaviour

[Patrick Diener]

H323 GW do not register AT ALL on all CCM and CUCM versions

preference configuration on the GW just tells the GW which dial-peer
to take first if destination-pattern on two or more dial-peers have
equal length matching.
If no preference is configured (which is pref. 0 by default) you leave
it up to the IOS software to choose one of these equal matching
dial-peers. This is not dependable on the CCM or CUCM version in use,
in fact the GW is not even aware that the dial-peers point to a CCM,
for the GW the CCMs are just H323 terminals...

Regards
Patrick

On 10/4/07, zohaib shabir <zohaibshabir at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually gateways are registered to the cluster not to individual CM, At
> least this is the case in CM 4.X but from your working it seems in CM 5.X
> this has changed. I have in my environment both CM 4.2 registered to gateway
> and it works with or without using the preference command, so probably i
> think there is a change in behavior as far as i can tell in CM 5x
>
> On 10/4/07, Alessandro Bertacco
> <alessandro.bertacco at lanservice.it> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > i can give my contribution...
> >
> > I've a similar situation with central site with one publiser and one
> subscriber.
> >
> > All phone registered on the subscriber
> >
> > The remote SRTS gateway of the brranch office configured with two dialpeer
> pointing subscriber and publisher, but WITH OUT preference.
> >
> > That's works fine in my network
> >
> > Let me know
> >
> > Regards
> > Alessandro
> >
> > ________________________________
>  Da: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] Per conto di
> Jordi Riba (Europe)
> > Inviato: giovedì 4 ottobre 2007 14.14
> > A: zohaib shabir
> > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] Very Strange Behaviour
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Zohaib
> >
> > But, what about if I only want to have a voip dial-peer pointing to my
> publisher? That situation was not working either.
> >
> > Does the way you configure VOIP dial-peers depends to which CCM (Publisher
> or Subscriber) is a gateway registered to?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jordi!
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
>  De: zohaib shabir [mailto:zohaibshabir at gmail.com]
> > Enviado el: jue 04/10/2007 14:02
> > Para: Jordi Riba (Europe)
> > CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Asunto: Re: [cisco-voip] Very Strange Behaviour
> >
> >
> > What you should do is to change the preference of the dial-peer pointing
> to the publisher to preference 1 or above. It will work hopefully.
> >
> >
> > On 10/4/07, Jordi Riba (Europe) <Jordi.Riba at eu.didata.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm gonna try to explain a very strange situation/behaviour I found
> yesterday in a customer site... I think this is not the way it should work
> but ... I would like some of you to re-check it.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance...
> > >
> > >
> > > Initial Situation:
> > > - CCM 5.1.2
> > > - One headquarters office. (CCM Cluster on it 1 publisher - 3
> subscribers)
> > > - Three branchoffices (h323-srst gateway on them) (12.4.9-T3)
> > > - All phones and gateways in the branch are registerd to the publisher.
> > > - Route-patterns and route-list registered to the publisher too.
> > > - Gateways in the branch offices have two voip dialpeer (one pointing to
> the publisher (precedence 1)  and another pointing to one subscriber
> (precedence 2))
> > >
> > > Action Done:
> > > Changed callmanager group in the branch offices device pool to get
> branch gateways and phones registered to a subscriber CCM.
> > >
> > > Problem:
> > > After this change, Call coming from the PSTN to the gateway can not
> contact IP Phones. In q931 debug we get a "Network out of order" message.
> > >
> > > Workaround:
> > > If we deactivate the voice dialpeer pointing to the Publisher --> We
> work only with the dialpeer pointing to the subscriber. All works fine.
> > >
> > > If we deactivate the voice dialpeer pointing to the Subscriber --> We
> work only with the dialpeer pointing to the Publisher. We get network out of
> order.
> > >
> > > I think this is not the way it should work, is it??
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > Jordi!
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Zohaib Shabir
> > Network Engineer(Voice)
> > DWP Group, TECH Division
> > Ph:+92-302-8232689
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Zohaib Shabir
> Network Engineer(Voice)
> DWP Group, TECH Division
> Ph:+92-302-8232689
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>