[cisco-voip] Home user
Curt Shaffer
cshaffer at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 19:40:52 EDT 2007
Actually due to a difference between who this customer uses for Server
network vs. Phone network; they have been using Sonicwall for normal VPN
connectivity, which I personally do not like based on personal experience.
But the setup will be as follows:
87x router or ASA ß-DSL or Cable-à INTERNET ß---PRI/Internet
connection--à2811 routerß-Phone LAN
From: Jerky [mailto:lists at jerkys.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:32 PM
To: Linsemier, Matthew
Cc: Curt Shaffer; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Home user
This has been kicked around for a while since we moved to CallManager but
not much thought has been given to it. I'm trying to understand how your
hardware is setup. How would it look, similar to one of these?
87x router <---DSL or Cable---> INTERNET <--T1 connection---> 3845
<--Ethernet--> LAN
or
87x router <---DSL or Cable---> INTERNET <--T1 connection---> 3845 <---> ASA
or PIX Firewall <--Ethernet--> LAN
Is the 3800 used for all your firewalling needs in lieu of something like an
ASA or PIX? Sonicwall's are currently in place and haven't worked very well
for the remote users it was tested with. The Sonicwalls we have don't have
anything similar to what the 871's seem to have in regards to vlans and
packet tagging. We would probably kick the Sonicwalls out if something else
would work better.
jeff
On Oct 16, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Linsemier, Matthew wrote:
We currently have about 40 production remote home teleworkers that have been
deployed using Cisco 871/877 wireless routers and a 7960 phones. We are
using a Cisco 3845 series router at the head-end so that we can control QoS
tagging on the egress / ingress points of both sides of the VPN tunnel. We
are using a phase 2 DMVPN solution dual-homed to two sites to provide secure
redundant connectivity.
It took me a bit to tweak my router configurations (I started on Cisco
831/837 routers) to get the results that we wanted, but all and all our
users are happy. There is the occasional jitter and packet loss (it is the
Internet mind you) but g.729 is working quite well coupled with business
cable and DSL services.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
Matt
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Curt Shaffer
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 6:37 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Home user
I was wondering want everyone out there is using for the situation where you
have someone on your CCM or CCME that has 1 phone at a home office.
Something tells me an ASA is overkill and I havent found solid information
that any of the 87x routers support tagging QoS of packets going through the
VPN tunnel. We would obviously like to have QoS in place even though its
not respected at their ISP just to make sure the VPN/Voice packets are
leaving their routers first as a best effort to get some quality.
Thanks
_____
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected
by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the
addressee identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED.
Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything
else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature
unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. If
you have received this communication in error, please immediately contact me
and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.
_____
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071016/373734aa/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list