[cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging

[Jason Aarons (US)]

I would disagree, FXS has limited supervision disconnect, stick with a
FXO as best practice. I've seen FXS interfaces get stuck offhook and the
paging units screech 130db noise....also ATA behaves differently between
CCM and CME, FXO doesn't. 

 -jason

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:54 PM
To: Countryman, Edward; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging

save yourself the trouble....get an adapter and use an FXS port. ;)

we use the Bogen TAM-B.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Countryman, Edward" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:41 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging


> Has anyone successfully configured and used an FXO port to access an
> overhead paging system?  All I can seem to find are E&M examples.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.