[cisco-voip] upgrade from 4.2 to 6.1 / license issues.

[Jonathan Charles]

When I did it with CCM5, the paste and get license always worked...
with 6 it has always failed... Doesn't matter, I just send it to
licensing at cisco.com and I have a license in a few hrs...


Jonathan

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Justin Steinberg <jsteinberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with this.  I've had no problems with the DMA process on two 4 to 6
> upgrades I've done.  The email with the permanent license arrives within
> minutes.
>
> However, I can't say the same for my dbreplication.  During both upgrades, I
> changed the hostname and IP of the server and after the upgrade/install to
> 6.1 the replication is broken due to stale records in the sqlhosts file. I
> have a TAC case open now for them to root in a fix it.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> > In theory if you manage to paste in the right bits of XML the tool
> > will generate your license and email it to you with no live person
> > involved at all.  I've done it once so I know it's possible.  User
> > experience varies greatly however.
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> > Just one quick note...
> >
> > You won't really get a PAK when you use the PUT to order an upgrade...
> > you get an Entitlement number and a Sales Order number.
> >
> > Once you have your MAC address, you can then use that info to email
> > licensing at cisco.com to get any licensing issues straightened out...
> >
> > Also, once you run DMA and build your new CCM6.1 box and import your
> > DMA data, you will get a temp license that you should send to Cisco to
> > get a real license.
> >
> > You can do this online at www.cisco.com/go/license and click the
> > option for 'no pak code and upgrade licenses'... then fill in your mac
> > (show network eth0 details) and paste the temp license into the field.
> > When it fails (with an XML error), email licensing with your SO and
> > Entitlement number and the output of the temp license and they will
> > send you a license
> >
> > Maybe not so quick of a note...
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> > > Everything Nick mentioned is correct.  More specifically the DMA
> > > process you
> > > go through when doing the upgrade from 4.2 to 6.1 will generate the
> > > xml file
> > > you then upload to the cisco licensing page (www.cisco.com/go/
> > > license) to
> > > get your node and DLU license.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Ryan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Nick Griffin wrote:
> > > Yes, you should be able to get smartnet/ucss entitling you to order
> > > the CUCM
> > > 4.2 to 6.1 upgrade via the product upgrade tool. This will contain
> > > your pak
> > > key required to obtain your feature license. Post upgrade, you will
> > > go into
> > > CUCM admin page, and obtain the xml license file to upload to cisco
> > > so they
> > > can generate the license keys for your cm servers and your dlu's
> > > for your
> > > phones. HTH
> > >
> > >
> > > Nick Griffin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Aykut NURAT
> > > <aykut.nurat at asay.com.tr> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi Everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I had a look on upgrade guides from ccm 4.2 to 6.1 and everything
> > >> seems
> > > clear to me except the business side.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I guess CM6.1U4-K9-78XX must be purchased to be able to obtain ccm
> > >> node
> > > license for each node, correct?
> > >>
> > >> Is there an alternative method like buying a service contract who can
> > > provide major upgrade from 4.2 to 6.1 to be able to get the node
> > > licenses?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Secondly because device unit licenses were bought with ip
> > >> telephones on
> > > CCM 4.2, there must be a way to provide device unit license files
> > > for free
> > > of charge for CCM 6.1. Is this possible? if yes, how?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> If these parts are out of the scope of this mailing group,
> > >> desperately
> > > apologize, but even local Cisco offices have lack of knowledge on
> > > these
> > > license issues hence any previous experience will be extremely
> > > appreciated.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Aykut
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> cisco-voip mailing list
> > >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >  cisco-voip mailing list
> > >  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>