[cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Well, I'm sure you use the same route patterns with H323 and FXO ports but we already know that FACs are not supported on those.

Any of the Cisco guys have any comments? I guess I could open a TAC case for confirmation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Aman Chugh 
  To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
  Cc: Jonathan Charles ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:33 AM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC


  SIP route patterns are used for domain routing/URL dialing , You can use regular route  patterns for digit dialing and as J said it should work with regular route patterns.


  Aman

   
  On 4/8/08, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 
    In the documentation, it has special instructions for SIP route patterns and
    the configuration options listed does not have FAC/CMC.

    Is anyone out there using SIP trunks with the regular route patterns or do
    you have to use the SIP route patterns?


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
    Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
    (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
    To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
    Cc: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
    Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:20 PM
    Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Trunk with FAC/CMC


    >I wouldn't see why not, just configure them on the route-patterns and
    > point the route-patterns to the trunks (RLs, RGs...)
    >
    >
    >
    > Jonathan
    >
    > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> I'm not sure if I posted this before, but can anyone confirm that FACs
    >> are
    >> not compatible with SIP trunks? We heavily use FACs for our residence and
    >> will likely need to go forward with continuing to use them. We wanted to
    >> evaluate SIP trunks as a replacement to our PRI service but when I looked
    >> up
    >> a SIP route pattern in the CCM 6.1 admin guide there was no FAC/CMC
    >> option.
    >>
    >> Comments?
    >>
    >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
    >> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
    >> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
    >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    >> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >>  cisco-voip mailing list
    >>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
    >>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
    >>
    >>
    >

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-voip mailing list
    cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080408/6e61d46f/attachment.html