[cisco-voip] DMA 4.2 to 6.x staging !!!
Jonathan Charles
jonvoip at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 10:24:41 EDT 2008
OK, found some doco...
"The host name can comprise up to 64 characters and can contain
alphanumeric characters and hyphens."
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/install/5_0/cmins504.html
Jonathan
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Jason Aarons (US)
<jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> When the decision was made TCP/IP didn't have a stack for DOS5.0/Windows
> 3.1, you were more likely to be running IPX/SPX then TCP/IP!
>
>
>
> Note Cisco is only using the first DNS RFC with 5.1.1 installer so hostnames
> that were valid in Windows will fail with CallManager. Customers won't
> understand why the old hostname worked, but the new isn't valid when the
> hostname check is done.
>
>
>
> For example 2kccm01 isn't a valid hostname because the old rfc didn't allow
> a host to begin with a number, thus CallManager install will fail when
> checking the hostname.
>
>
>
> Perhaps this has been fixed in 6.1.1
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:04 AM
> To: Matt Slaga (US)
>
>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DMA 4.2 to 6.x staging !!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That's because an _ is an accepted character in NetBIOS names which is what
> the computer name is. they were not trying to follow DNS standards. What I
> don't think is correct is that you can't go from an _ in the name, use DMA
> to export the information and then change then name during the upgrade
> process. I think this was a TAC person that didn't do enough research and an
> engineer that just accepted what the TAC person said as gospel. I would like
> to see something that says you can't upgrade if you have a _ in the computer
> name.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Matt Slaga (US) <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> This has to do with standard DNS naming. Microsoft in their infinite wisdom
> allowed _'s even though they are not allowed in the DNS RFC. Linux follows
> strictly to the DNS RFC which does not allow underscores in names.
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:52 AM
> To: Jonathan Charles
>
>
>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DMA 4.2 to 6.x staging !!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Is this _ problem documented somewhere on Cisco.com? I find it hard to
> accept that you could not use an _ for the DMA export.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please do not say that you had an underscore in your old hostname...
>
> Because if you do, you cannot run DMA.
>
> We ran into this a few months ago on a 4.1 - 6.0 upgrade and we ended
> up having to export everything via BAT and reimporting... TAC said an
> underscore means DMA cannot be used.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Djokic Sinisa <sdjokic at mds.rs> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > hi crew..
> >
> >
> >
> > i'm staging for migration from CCM 4.2 to UCCM 6.x cluster and i did DMA
> > export..
> >
> > so during UCCM 6.0 install when it asked me for a hostname i tried to
> enter
> > the old one but it didn't excepted it obviously the old hostname has
> > underscores in it..
> >
> > it's like COMPANY_CCM_X..
> >
> > so i entered new one..
> >
> > is that going to cause problems?..beacuse of the DMA export fiule
> containg
> > old hostname..IP address remained the same..
> >
> > i'm in the middle of it so i don't have any results yet..
> >
> > if it would cause problems what's the soluton..
> >
> > i do sincerely hope it;s not the fresh install..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > thanx..
> >
> >
> >
> > regards..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sinisa Djokic
> >
> > System Engineer
> > CCNP,CCDA,CQS-CWLDS,CS-CIPTDS,CS-CIPCCES Cisco Certified
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > MDS Informaticki inzenjering
> > Bul. Arsenija Carnojevica 170
> > 11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia
> > Tel: +381 11 2015 200, 2015 273
> > Fax: +381 11 3194 954
> > www.mds.rs
> > sdjokic at mds.rs
> >
> >
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list