[cisco-voip] Extension Mobility
isa mattar
isanet at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 00:41:57 EST 2008
Hi,
Check this step:
Subscribing IP Phones to Cisco Extension Mobility
To subscribe extension mobility to the IP phone, go to the Related Links
drop-down list box in the upper, right corner of the window and choose
Subscribe/Unsubscribe Services; then, click Go.
A separate Subscribed Cisco IP Phone Services window displays.
[image: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]From the Select a
Service drop-down list box, choose the service to which you want this IP
phone to subscribe.
[image: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]Click Next.
[image: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]Click Subscribe.
[image: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]The new service(s)
displays under Subscribed Services.
[image: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]Click Save.
Regards
Isa Mattar
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:10 AM, <cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Extension Mobility (Hasan Khan)
> 2. Re: Forwarding To extension in Unity (Matthew J. Hughes)
> 3. Re: Securing Voice networks (Mark Holloway)
> 4. Test --- please ignore (Hasan Khan)
> 5. Re: Extension Mobility (Ryan Ratliff)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:37:44 -0800 (PST)
> From: Hasan Khan <hasan_asghar at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Extension Mobility
> To: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <264164.60620.qm at web33404.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello,
>
> For doing extension mobility, I have done the followiing.
>
> 1) Activate the extension mobility from Cisco Unified Serviceability (Tools
> -- Service Activation). I have done this step for publisher and as well as
> for all subscribers.
> 2) On publisher, went to Device -- Device Settings -- Phone Services and
> configure service with URL.
>
> Shouldn't I see the extension mobility service on my phone? Right now, I
> don't see the service on my phones.
>
> Any idea, what should I do to see the service on the phones?
>
> Thanks,
> Hasan
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081202/c1080c84/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:43:25 -0800
> From: "Matthew J. Hughes" <mattjhughes at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Forwarding To extension in Unity
> To: "James Buchanan" <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> <ea211ea30812021543p72f8c704rf2e5c69c1a7931e3 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks for the help, I am having trouble in the transfer rules knowing what
> digits to send it to to forward to a external DID, i tried the 9 prefix but
> that doesnt seem to work, the system is integrated with CCM6, but I am
> unsure if it has a method of dialing out on its own. Whenever I attept to
> use the transfer rule it just says the box is busy and to leave a message.
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:33 PM, James Buchanan <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > Setup a System Contact in Unity Connection. In Unity, use a call handler
> > with that extension and with a transfer rule to the number.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> > cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Matthew J. Hughes
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:33 PM
> > *To:* cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Forwarding To extension in Unity
> >
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to forward to a phone number that is not associated with a
> > voicemail box in Unity or Unity Connection? I have not been able to find
> a
> > way to do this in Unity Connection 2, maybe Unity Connection 7? This
> would
> > seem like a standard Phone Tree feature. Thanks for the help in advance.
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081202/9e490db6/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:44:21 -0700
> From: "Mark Holloway" <mh at markholloway.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Securing Voice networks
> To: "'Jason Aarons \(US\)'" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>, "'Lelio
> Fulgenzi'" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "'Scott Voll'" <
> svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: 'cisco-voip' <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <002001c954d7$e6e83810$b4b8a830$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> You can also use VRF Lite which allows you to use VRF's without using MPLS.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 4:36 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Scott Voll
> Cc: cisco-voip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Securing Voice networks
>
>
>
> VRF is the backbone of how MPLS works. Your network routes are in a
> private
> VRF that only you can see. If they can hack or mis-configure the VRF then
> your routes could be advertised to a hack is the security worst case
> scenario with MPLS. I believe you can filter a VRF into another VRF but
> haven't seen that myself. I went thru backbone service provider MPLS
> training, did all the labs and haven't used VRF much since then.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:07 PM
> To: Scott Voll
> Cc: cisco-voip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Securing Voice networks
>
>
>
> The term is VRF. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VRF
>
> I'm still not clear as to the difference, but from what I understand, they
> are logically two separate networks and go beyond the level of seperation
> that VLANs provide. For example, you can have two VRF domains and route
> them
> across your network, both with the same IP address space but still
> logically
> separated. What I don't know, is whether you can somehow route between two
> VRF domains (if that's even what you call them).
>
> For now, we are using ACLs, and for the most part they work, but it's not
> ideal. Putting things behind a firewall makes sense, but with multiple data
> centres, you have to ensure that the voice servers can communicate with
> each
> other unhindered/unblocked. There are also some issues with respect to
> asymetrical routing which I think is an issue for us.
>
> Until Cisco comes up with a recommended design for putting their voice
> servers behind firewalls in multiple data centres, I think people will be
> clamoring.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: "<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 5:56:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Securing Voice networks
>
> I have multiple Voice networks that I would like to put behind my FWSM. At
> CIPTUG (pass the mic) i asked the question of how others were doing it and
> I
> thought they were using VFR. is that the right term?
>
>
>
> Can someone give me a run down of how they are doing it?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _____
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
> deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081202/30d8475b/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:02:39 -0800 (PST)
> From: Hasan Khan <hasan_asghar at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Test --- please ignore
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <211213.50920.qm at web33403.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081202/32b03309/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:07:55 -0500
> From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension Mobility
> To: Hasan Khan <hakhan at tricolour.queensu.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <6DA0EF5E-AFC6-455E-BB5A-017E10E43B56 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
> DelSp="yes"
>
> You need to subscribe the phones to the EM service before it will
> show up on the phone.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Hasan Khan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> For doing extension mobility, I have done the followiing.
>
> 1) Activate the extension mobility from Cisco Unified Serviceability
> (Tools -- Service Activation). I have done this step for publisher
> and as well as for all subscribers.
> 2) On publisher, went to Device -- Device Settings -- Phone Services
> and configure service with URL.
>
> Shouldn't I see the extension mobility service on my phone? Right
> now, I don't see the service on my phones.
>
> Any idea, what should I do to see the service on the phones?
>
> Thanks,
> Hasan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081202/c87aaf47/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081203/71fe2dcd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list