[cisco-voip] Enable Caller ID UNblock

[David Zhars]

Here's what I am trying:

dial-peer voice 14 pots
 destination-pattern 8T
 port 0/0/3
dial-peer voice 24 pots
 destination-pattern 8.*82[2-9]
 port 0/0/3




On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

> Can you send us the dial-peer portion of your config?
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:58 AM, David Zhars wrote:
>
> Ryan, here's the response on the 2801:
>
> Macro Exp.: 8*825551212
> No match, result=1
>
>
> Methinks the asterisk may be sort of a "reserved keyword".  (Maybe used as
> a wildcard or something)
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>  Do the dial-peers on the gateway allow it to route that called party
>> number correctly?
>> Take your number (ie 8*825555555) and use 'show dialplan number' to verify
>> what dial-peer it will match.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>
>> The 2801 is in H.323
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is the 2801 MGCP or H.323?  With discard digits none you are sending
>>> 8*82.... to the gateway.  If the telco can't route this it will send back
>>> unknown/unallocated number and CUCM will play that tone via Annunciator.
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I have some lines where we block caller ID plugged into my 2801
>>> router.
>>> When we tried to call a #, that # would not accept calls from people who
>>> block their Caller ID.
>>> So we tried the *82 suffix, and it did not go through.
>>>
>>> I have created a route pattern that looks like this:
>>> 8.*82[2-9]XXXXXX
>>> (users in this building press an 8 for an outside line)
>>>
>>> My Discard Digits is set to <none>
>>>
>>> The calls are still not completed (I get the Cisco "call cannot be
>>> completed as dialed")
>>> Calls should go out the POTS lines on the 2801, so is it that I should be
>>> doing something on the 2801 and not in CCM 4.1(3)
>>>
>>> Thanks anyone!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081210/ec089517/attachment.html>