[cisco-voip] Enable Caller ID UNblock

[Ryan Ratliff]

Interesting... I get the same results with 'show dialplan number' but  
the call is routed.
My config:
!
dial-peer voice 10 pots
  destination-pattern 8.*82T
  port 0/2/0:23
!
dial-peer voice 11 pots
  destination-pattern 8T
  port 0/2/0:23
!

2851#show dialplan number 8*8255555555
Macro Exp.: 8*8255555555
No match, result=1

2851#csim start 8*825555555
csim: called number = 8*825555555, loop count = 1 ping count = 0

*Dec 10 16:06:43.114: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number:  
Invalid type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13
*Dec 10 16:06:43.114: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw- 
type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Called num *825555555
*Dec 10 16:06:43.118: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8   
callref = 0x0081
         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                 Standard = CCITT
                 Transfer Capability = Speech
                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
         Channel ID i = 0xA98386
                 Exclusive, Channel 6
         Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '*825555555'
                 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

In my case even though the 'show dialplan number' command didn't  
indicate any matches the call would route out the port configured on  
the dial-peer.   I'd say it's time to start doing some debugging to  
confirm the router is sending the call out to the PSTN.   You can use  
'debug h225 asn1' to confirm CCM is sending the call to the  
gateway.    Since you are using an analog line you'll have to use  
something like 'debug vpm sig' or 'debug voip ccapi inout' to look at  
the pots leg of the call.

-Ryan

On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:02 AM, David Zhars wrote:

Here's what I am trying:

dial-peer voice 14 pots
  destination-pattern 8T
  port 0/0/3
dial-peer voice 24 pots
  destination-pattern 8.*82[2-9]
  port 0/0/3

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>  
wrote:
Can you send us the dial-peer portion of your config?

-Ryan

On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:58 AM, David Zhars wrote:

Ryan, here's the response on the 2801:

Macro Exp.: 8*825551212
No match, result=1


Methinks the asterisk may be sort of a "reserved keyword".  (Maybe  
used as a wildcard or something)

Thanks for any help!



On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>  
wrote:
Do the dial-peers on the gateway allow it to route that called party  
number correctly?

Take your number (ie 8*825555555) and use 'show dialplan number' to  
verify what dial-peer it will match.

-Ryan

On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, David Zhars wrote:

The 2801 is in H.323

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
Is the 2801 MGCP or H.323?
With discard digits none you are sending 8*82.... to the gateway.  If  
the telco can't route this it will send back unknown/unallocated  
number and CUCM will play that tone via Annunciator.

-Ryan

On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, David Zhars wrote:

Yes, I have some lines where we block caller ID plugged into my 2801  
router.
When we tried to call a #, that # would not accept calls from people  
who block their Caller ID.
So we tried the *82 suffix, and it did not go through.

I have created a route pattern that looks like this:
8.*82[2-9]XXXXXX
(users in this building press an 8 for an outside line)

My Discard Digits is set to <none>

The calls are still not completed (I get the Cisco "call cannot be  
completed as dialed")
Calls should go out the POTS lines on the 2801, so is it that I  
should be doing something on the 2801 and not in CCM 4.1(3)

Thanks anyone!




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081210/005d4179/attachment.html>