[cisco-voip] Enable Caller ID UNblock

[David Zhars]

Hmm...this is what I get with the csim command.

NX-Rad-2801-1#csim start 8*85551212
csim: called number = 8*85551212, loop count = 1 ping count = 0
.
csim: loop = 1, failed = 0
csim: call attempted = 1, setup failed = 0, tone failed = 1


On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

> Interesting... I get the same results with 'show dialplan number' but the
> call is routed.My config:
> !
> dial-peer voice 10 pots
>  destination-pattern 8.*82T
>  port 0/2/0:23
> !
> dial-peer voice 11 pots
>  destination-pattern 8T
>  port 0/2/0:23
> !
>
> 2851#show dialplan number 8*8255555555
> Macro Exp.: 8*8255555555
> No match, result=1
>
> 2851#csim start 8*825555555
> csim: called number = 8*825555555, loop count = 1 ping count = 0
>
> *Dec 10 16:06:43.114: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: pak_private_number: Invalid
> type/plan 0x0 0x0 may be overriden; sw-type 13
> *Dec 10 16:06:43.114: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type
> 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Called num *825555555
> *Dec 10 16:06:43.118: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref =
> 0x0081
>         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
>                 Standard = CCITT
>                 Transfer Capability = Speech
>                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
>                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>         Channel ID i = 0xA98386
>                 Exclusive, Channel 6
>         Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '*825555555'
>                 Plan:ISDN, Type:National
>
> In my case even though the 'show dialplan number' command didn't indicate
> any matches the call would route out the port configured on the dial-peer.
> I'd say it's time to start doing some debugging to confirm the router is
> sending the call out to the PSTN.   You can use 'debug h225 asn1' to confirm
> CCM is sending the call to the gateway.    Since you are using an analog
> line you'll have to use something like 'debug vpm sig' or 'debug voip ccapi
> inout' to look at the pots leg of the call.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:02 AM, David Zhars wrote:
>
> Here's what I am trying:
>
> dial-peer voice 14 pots
>  destination-pattern 8T
>  port 0/0/3
> dial-peer voice 24 pots
>  destination-pattern 8.*82[2-9]
>  port 0/0/3
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>  Can you send us the dial-peer portion of your config?
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:58 AM, David Zhars wrote:
>>
>> Ryan, here's the response on the 2801:
>>
>> Macro Exp.: 8*825551212
>> No match, result=1
>>
>>
>> Methinks the asterisk may be sort of a "reserved keyword".  (Maybe used as
>> a wildcard or something)
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Do the dial-peers on the gateway allow it to route that called party
>>> number correctly?
>>> Take your number (ie 8*825555555) and use 'show dialplan number' to
>>> verify what dial-peer it will match.
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>>
>>> The 2801 is in H.323
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is the 2801 MGCP or H.323?  With discard digits none you are sending
>>>> 8*82.... to the gateway.  If the telco can't route this it will send back
>>>> unknown/unallocated number and CUCM will play that tone via Annunciator.
>>>>
>>>> -Ryan
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I have some lines where we block caller ID plugged into my 2801
>>>> router.
>>>> When we tried to call a #, that # would not accept calls from people who
>>>> block their Caller ID.
>>>> So we tried the *82 suffix, and it did not go through.
>>>>
>>>> I have created a route pattern that looks like this:
>>>> 8.*82[2-9]XXXXXX
>>>> (users in this building press an 8 for an outside line)
>>>>
>>>> My Discard Digits is set to <none>
>>>>
>>>> The calls are still not completed (I get the Cisco "call cannot be
>>>> completed as dialed")
>>>> Calls should go out the POTS lines on the 2801, so is it that I should
>>>> be doing something on the 2801 and not in CCM 4.1(3)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks anyone!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081210/b1436893/attachment.html>