[cisco-voip] Enable Caller ID UNblock

[David Zhars]

I have figured this out.  If anyone else ever wants to know how to do it
(prob easier to just have the phone company turn caller ID on the lines, but
that's a different tale)

Here's how I made it work:


dial-peer voice 24 pots
 destination-pattern 8.*82[2-9]
 port 0/0/3
forward-digits 9

so this will work with all 7 digit numbers.  Now I'll have to add one for 11
digit numbers (1 + AC + 7 numbers).

Dave

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's what I am trying:
>
> dial-peer voice 14 pots
>  destination-pattern 8T
>  port 0/0/3
> dial-peer voice 24 pots
>  destination-pattern 8.*82[2-9]
>  port 0/0/3
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>  Can you send us the dial-peer portion of your config?
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:58 AM, David Zhars wrote:
>>
>> Ryan, here's the response on the 2801:
>>
>> Macro Exp.: 8*825551212
>> No match, result=1
>>
>>
>> Methinks the asterisk may be sort of a "reserved keyword".  (Maybe used as
>> a wildcard or something)
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Do the dial-peers on the gateway allow it to route that called party
>>> number correctly?
>>> Take your number (ie 8*825555555) and use 'show dialplan number' to
>>> verify what dial-peer it will match.
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>>
>>> The 2801 is in H.323
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is the 2801 MGCP or H.323?  With discard digits none you are sending
>>>> 8*82.... to the gateway.  If the telco can't route this it will send back
>>>> unknown/unallocated number and CUCM will play that tone via Annunciator.
>>>>
>>>> -Ryan
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I have some lines where we block caller ID plugged into my 2801
>>>> router.
>>>> When we tried to call a #, that # would not accept calls from people who
>>>> block their Caller ID.
>>>> So we tried the *82 suffix, and it did not go through.
>>>>
>>>> I have created a route pattern that looks like this:
>>>> 8.*82[2-9]XXXXXX
>>>> (users in this building press an 8 for an outside line)
>>>>
>>>> My Discard Digits is set to <none>
>>>>
>>>> The calls are still not completed (I get the Cisco "call cannot be
>>>> completed as dialed")
>>>> Calls should go out the POTS lines on the 2801, so is it that I should
>>>> be doing something on the 2801 and not in CCM 4.1(3)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks anyone!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081210/832fc64e/attachment.html>