[cisco-voip] Need suggestion with Video Conferencing setup

[Scott Voll]

1.  Both Polycom and Tandberg are really good IP VC units.  we have both.
but lately have been buying more Tandberg.  Just trying to standardize.
    1.1 A lot has to do with what your looking for?  Some of the higer end
units have a 3 or 4 way bridge built in.
        if yiou going to do larger conference rooms you might look at a mic
mixer so you can get everyones audio
2.  BW is going to be a Company based requirement.  384k would be the
minimum I would look at for a standard H323 IPVC.  Now with that being said
if I were getting into it now and money was not a BIG isusu I would start
leaning toward the HD IPVCs but I don't know what the minimum BW you would
want for them.

Just my 2 cents

Scott

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Syed Khalid Ali <
syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't have any experience with Video Conferencing except one that I
> mentioned inmy previous email.
>
> Not looking for Cisco VTA or something similar. I need to setup video
> conferencing for 8-10 users in a conference room in site-A and 1-user
> in site-B. So need suggestions on the following:
>
> 1- Should I go with Polycom or Tandberg
>    1.1 What features should I look for
> 2- Bandwidth requirement.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> > please explain what your looking to do.
> >
> > if it's just simple phone to phone stuff, VTA works good.  you will need
> to
> > setup a MCU (which is not cheap) for any thing more then point to point.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Syed Khalid Ali
> > <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> One of our client want to go for Video Conferencing setup. I need
> >> suggestion or feedback if some one already have.
> >> Running CCM 4.2(3) and IPCCX 4.0.
> >>
> >> A few month earlier I had a chance to setup Video Conferencing with
> >> Polycom HD 9000 series but all in vain. After doing some research I
> >> found out that IOS had some NAT caveat(s) that was unresolved.
> >>
> >> So I am in doubt what to do!
> >> --
> >> Thanks,
> >> Syed Khalid Ali
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Syed Khalid Ali
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081226/ea7294bf/attachment.html>