[cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...

[lelio at uoguelph.ca]

Um, yeah. They are already EOL. You can't buy them anymore and they  
are EOS 2012.

It takes us about that long to plan for such a large budget item.

Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
Computing & Communications
University of Guelph
519-824-4120 x56354

...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)

[XKJ2000]

On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:30 PM, "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>  
wrote:

> Well, I have a lot of customers who are aggregating a LOT of PRIs on  
> 6608s... what is Cisco going to replace it with?
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> I'm gonna miss being able to register one port to one cluster and  
> another port to a different cluster.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
> Computing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that sucks... I kind of like the 6608... but we just got a  
>> 2821 so, we will use that instead...
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Linsemier, Matthew <MLinsemier at apassurance.com 
>> > wrote:
>> I was informed that the CCM-ACT's will not support this Codec  
>> either, so I was a bit annoyed by this as well.  I would guess that  
>> the 6608 will probably fall in the same boat.  It looks like DSP  
>> farms in routers running IOS is the way that Cisco wants us to  
>> transcode in the future.
>>
>>
>>
>> MAtt
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
>> ] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:56 PM
>> To: Ryan Ratliff
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...
>>
>>
>>
>> Right, I found the same info... it seems well supported in 12.4.15T  
>> and above in IOS (MGCP and H.323) but I have been unable to find  
>> any info on transcoding/support on a 6608... my guess is the DSPs  
>> can't handle the codec...
>>
>> Annoying.
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can't seem to find the 6608 downloads on cisco.com but the first  
>> place I see that 6608 load is in a devpack from May of this year.   
>> That's actually a lot newer than I would have thought.
>>
>>
>>
>> The gist of my first email is that I don't think you're going to  
>> see support for iLBC on the 6608.
>>
>>
>>
>> Unity Connections 7.0(1) I can see supports iLBC, not sure on the  
>> Unity TSP.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, I am running CCM 7.0.1
>>
>> The 6608 is running D00404000032 (base load from ccm 7)
>>
>> Unity TSP is 8.3.1
>>
>> 7965 is running 8.4.1S (iLBC was supported in 8.3)
>>
>> Not sure what TSP or 6608 load supports iLBC...
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> What load is your 6608 running?  What date was that load released?
>>
>> When did the IP phones start supporting iLBC?
>>
>>
>>
>> I think the answer to those questions will tell you why you can't  
>> get calls to your 6608 to use iLBC.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for Unity it just depends on if they have a TSP that supports  
>> iLBC.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>
>>
>> OK, so how do we get this to work...?
>>
>> I have Cisco 7965s at remote sites (user's homes) and when they  
>> make calls, their codec is showing up as G.729, even tho their  
>> region is iLBC (G.728).
>>
>> My voice gateway is a 6608 (single PRI, rest are transcoders, conf  
>> bridges)...
>>
>> Calls to Unity use G.729 as well...
>>
>> Calls to other 7965s (on net) are iLBC...
>>
>> So, how do I support this codec
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be  
>> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely  
>> for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the  
>> intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of  
>> this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block,  
>> the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is  
>> intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific  
>> statement to the contrary is included in this message. If you have  
>> received this  communication in error, please immediately contact  
>> me and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081227/73cba7fd/attachment-0001.html>