[cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...

[lelio at uoguelph.ca]

Sorry, misread your email.

Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
Computing & Communications
University of Guelph
519-824-4120 x56354

...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)

[XKJ2000]

On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, lelio at uoguelph.ca wrote:

> Um, yeah. They are already EOL. You can't buy them anymore and they  
> are EOS 2012.
>
> It takes us about that long to plan for such a large budget item.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
> Computing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:30 PM, "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Well, I have a lot of customers who are aggregating a LOT of PRIs  
>> on 6608s... what is Cisco going to replace it with?
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM,  <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>> I'm gonna miss being able to register one port to one cluster and  
>> another port to a different cluster.
>>
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
>> Computing & Communications
>> University of Guelph
>> 519-824-4120 x56354
>>
>> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>>
>> [XKJ2000]
>>
>> On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Charles"  
>> <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, that sucks... I kind of like the 6608... but we just got a  
>>> 2821 so, we will use that instead...
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Linsemier, Matthew <MLinsemier at apassurance.com 
>>> > wrote:
>>> I was informed that the CCM-ACT's will not support this Codec  
>>> either, so I was a bit annoyed by this as well.  I would guess  
>>> that the 6608 will probably fall in the same boat.  It looks like  
>>> DSP farms in routers running IOS is the way that Cisco wants us to  
>>> transcode in the future.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MAtt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
>>> ] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
>>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:56 PM
>>> To: Ryan Ratliff
>>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Right, I found the same info... it seems well supported in  
>>> 12.4.15T and above in IOS (MGCP and H.323) but I have been unable  
>>> to find any info on transcoding/support on a 6608... my guess is  
>>> the DSPs can't handle the codec...
>>>
>>> Annoying.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can't seem to find the 6608 downloads on cisco.com but the first  
>>> place I see that 6608 load is in a devpack from May of this year.   
>>> That's actually a lot newer than I would have thought.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The gist of my first email is that I don't think you're going to  
>>> see support for iLBC on the 6608.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Unity Connections 7.0(1) I can see supports iLBC, not sure on the  
>>> Unity TSP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, I am running CCM 7.0.1
>>>
>>> The 6608 is running D00404000032 (base load from ccm 7)
>>>
>>> Unity TSP is 8.3.1
>>>
>>> 7965 is running 8.4.1S (iLBC was supported in 8.3)
>>>
>>> Not sure what TSP or 6608 load supports iLBC...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Ryan Ratliff  
>>> <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> What load is your 6608 running?  What date was that load released?
>>>
>>> When did the IP phones start supporting iLBC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think the answer to those questions will tell you why you can't  
>>> get calls to your 6608 to use iLBC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As for Unity it just depends on if they have a TSP that supports  
>>> iLBC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, so how do we get this to work...?
>>>
>>> I have Cisco 7965s at remote sites (user's homes) and when they  
>>> make calls, their codec is showing up as G.729, even tho their  
>>> region is iLBC (G.728).
>>>
>>> My voice gateway is a 6608 (single PRI, rest are transcoders, conf  
>>> bridges)...
>>>
>>> Calls to Unity use G.729 as well...
>>>
>>> Calls to other 7965s (on net) are iLBC...
>>>
>>> So, how do I support this codec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>>> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be  
>>> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely  
>>> for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the  
>>> intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution  
>>> of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information  
>>> block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this  
>>> message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a  
>>> specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. If  
>>> you have received this communication in error, please immediately  
>>> contact me and delete this communication from your computer. Thank  
>>> you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081227/a8daa116/attachment.html>