[cisco-voip] CCM Upgrade - Best Practices

jean-francois.guay at bell.ca jean-francois.guay at bell.ca
Wed Jan 9 09:24:58 EST 2008


Ryan,
 
As a follow up question, what should we do for CCM5 or 6 where Service Activation is the only official way of shutting down the service?
 
 
 

   Jean-Francois Guay, ing.
  Consultant Technologies IP - Services Professionnels
  Communications Convergentes et Solutions Mobiles 
  Bell Solutions T.I.C
  ' 514-391-9698

 

________________________________

De : Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Envoyé : 9 janvier 2008 09:16
À : Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc : cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; STEVEN CASPER
Objet : Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Upgrade - Best Practices


Don't ever deactivate the CCM service via Service Activation unless you are permanently removing a subscriber from the cluster or turning it off on the publisher for good. 

As Lelio saw when you do this you lose all service parameters for the server.  Also when you re-activate the service the server gets a new CTI node ID.  This means that the CCM service on all other nodes in the cluster will have to be restarted before they pick up this change, ie no SDL links to this server.   The last big thing de-activation does is remove the server from all CM groups it is in.   

Stopping/Starting/Disabling the service via the Win2k services.msc doesn't hurt anything and if you need to prevent CCM from starting automatically set it to Manual or Disabled there.  


-Ryan


On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

Redefining device pools has worked for us in the past, but they say not to make changes during the upgrade, so there's no way to really keep a phone away from a subscriber during the upgrade process other than disabling it or setting it to manual.
 
I'm guessing setting it to manual in WIN2K should work, but they've always told us not to do that. ;)
 

	----- Original Message -----
	From: STEVEN CASPER <mailto:SCASPER at mtb.com> 
	To: Ryan Ratliff <mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>  ; Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
	Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:53 AM
	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Upgrade - Best Practices

	Well that is frightening possibility - hence my question!
	 
	The CCM service could be set to disable via the Services window in WIN2K or I think by using the  Service Activation window in Call Manager Serviceability.
	 
	 I am trying to come up with the least service effecting procedure for CCM patching and upgrades since we just moved several 24x7 business critical groups over to IPT.

	>>> "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 1/9/2008 8:42 AM >>>
	
	I'm not sure what you're using to "disable" CallManager, but we tried this once (perhaps we de-activated?), and all the service parameters for that subscriber were lost (set to default) and anything that relied on that subscriber, i.e. call park numbers, callmanager group entry, etc, was deleted!
	 
	It did not make for a fun time.
	 
	--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
	Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
	(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
	"Life expectancy would grow by leaps and bounds if green vegetables smelled as good as bacon."
	Doug Larson
	 
	 

		----- Original Message -----
		From: STEVEN CASPER <mailto:SCASPER at mtb.com> 
		To: Ryan Ratliff <mailto:rratliff at cisco.com> 
		Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:36 AM
		Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Upgrade - Best Practices

		I like the idea of :
		 
		1. stopping the CM service on the server to fail everyone over to next server
		2. disable or set to manual startup the CallManager  
		    service on the servers
		 
		 Does it matter if this is done via CCM Control Center in Serviceability to stop the CCM service and Service Activation to disable the CCM service or can these actions be done under Win2k Services? 
		 
		 Does the Call Manager service need to be running on a server during an upgrade of the application or the OS?
		 
		Steve
		
		>>> "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com> 10/24/2007 11:44 AM >>>
		The easiest way to ensure phones don't register to servers during the  
		upgrade is to disable or set to manual startup the CallManager  
		service on the servers being upgraded.   That way you can do the  
		upgrade, reboot the server, and take a look at things before having  
		phones fail back to it.
		
		-Ryan
		
		On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:53 AM, STEVEN CASPER wrote:
		
		
		  Looking for some advice for the best way to do Call Manager  
		upgrades to minimize system disruptions. From a recent ES doc:
		
		"You can minimize call-processing interruptions if you register all  
		devices
		to servers that are running the same version of Cisco CallManager  
		during the
		entire upgrade process; i.e., you register all devices to the backup  
		Cisco
		CallManager servers or the primary Cisco CallManager servers, but not to
		both types of servers."
		
		  I understand what the ES doc is saying what I am not sure about is  
		the best practice to ensure that all devices stay registered on the  
		backup or primary servers during the upgrade. Should you manipulate  
		your Call Manager groups during the upgrade?
		
		  For instance all of our devices are registered to Subscribers A, B,  
		C, & D. We have two back up subscribers X & Y. Do we:
		
		1. Upgrade the Publisher.
		2. Upgrade X & Y
		3. Change our Call Manager Groups so X & Y subs are the primary.
		4. Reset all devices so they re-register to X & Y.
		5. Upgrade A, B, C, & D.
		6. Change Call Manager groups so A, B, C, & D are primary again.
		7. Reset devices.
		
		
		
		Thanks!
		
		Steve Casper
		Voice Technologies
		M&T Bank
		(410) 347-6026
		************************************
		This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information  
		that is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not  
		the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from  
		disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information  
		contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in  
		error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material  
		in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication  
		may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to  
		the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley  
		Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such  
		information for any purpose other than to provide the services for  
		which you are receiving the information.
		There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  
		The sender of this information does not control the method of  
		transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation  
		for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this  
		transmission.
		************************************
		
		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
		
		
		

		************************************
		This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
		There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
		************************************
		


________________________________


		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

	************************************
	This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
	There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
	************************************
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080109/4914e372/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list